尼日利亚西尼日尔三角洲第四纪Sombreiro - Warri三角洲平原沉积物含水层脆弱性比较研究

K. Aweto, O. Ohwoghere-Asuma, T. Omeru
{"title":"尼日利亚西尼日尔三角洲第四纪Sombreiro - Warri三角洲平原沉积物含水层脆弱性比较研究","authors":"K. Aweto, O. Ohwoghere-Asuma, T. Omeru","doi":"10.4314/ijs.v25i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the effect of two parameters, resistivity and hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone, and their reliability in assessing aquifer vulnerability. Hence, the vulnerability of the aquifers within the Quaternary – Sombreiro Deltaic deposits to contamination was assessed using two models: longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance. The results from the simulation of the models show four vulnerability zones indicated by the longitudinal conductance model, while the hydraulic resistance model revealed five zones. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that thickness, lithology, and the interactions of the two variables have a significant effect on the two models. The longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance models show a closer coincidence of vulnerability in 72% of the study area. The differences in results and delimitations of varying vulnerability zones by the two models depend primarily on the two parameters employed in estimating the vulnerability, with the vadose layer's hydraulic conductivity imposing remarkable influence on the general vulnerability of the study area.","PeriodicalId":13487,"journal":{"name":"Ife Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative aquifer vulnerability study of the Quaternary Sombreiro – Warri Deltaic plain deposits, Western Niger Delta, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"K. Aweto, O. Ohwoghere-Asuma, T. Omeru\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ijs.v25i1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the effect of two parameters, resistivity and hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone, and their reliability in assessing aquifer vulnerability. Hence, the vulnerability of the aquifers within the Quaternary – Sombreiro Deltaic deposits to contamination was assessed using two models: longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance. The results from the simulation of the models show four vulnerability zones indicated by the longitudinal conductance model, while the hydraulic resistance model revealed five zones. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that thickness, lithology, and the interactions of the two variables have a significant effect on the two models. The longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance models show a closer coincidence of vulnerability in 72% of the study area. The differences in results and delimitations of varying vulnerability zones by the two models depend primarily on the two parameters employed in estimating the vulnerability, with the vadose layer's hydraulic conductivity imposing remarkable influence on the general vulnerability of the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ife Journal of Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ife Journal of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v25i1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ife Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v25i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了渗流带电阻率和导水率两个参数对含水层易损性评价的影响及其可靠性。因此,采用纵向电导和水力阻力两种模型评估了第四纪-索姆布雷罗三角洲沉积物含水层对污染的脆弱性。模型模拟结果表明,纵向电导模型显示出4个脆弱区,水力阻力模型显示出5个脆弱区。双向方差分析(ANOVA)表明,厚度、岩性以及这两个变量的相互作用对两个模型都有显著影响。纵向电导模型和水力阻力模型在72%的研究区显示出更接近的易损性吻合。两种模型对不同易损性区的结果和划分差异主要取决于易损性估算所采用的两个参数,其中渗透层的导水率对研究区总体易损性影响显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative aquifer vulnerability study of the Quaternary Sombreiro – Warri Deltaic plain deposits, Western Niger Delta, Nigeria
This paper investigates the effect of two parameters, resistivity and hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone, and their reliability in assessing aquifer vulnerability. Hence, the vulnerability of the aquifers within the Quaternary – Sombreiro Deltaic deposits to contamination was assessed using two models: longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance. The results from the simulation of the models show four vulnerability zones indicated by the longitudinal conductance model, while the hydraulic resistance model revealed five zones. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals that thickness, lithology, and the interactions of the two variables have a significant effect on the two models. The longitudinal conductance and hydraulic resistance models show a closer coincidence of vulnerability in 72% of the study area. The differences in results and delimitations of varying vulnerability zones by the two models depend primarily on the two parameters employed in estimating the vulnerability, with the vadose layer's hydraulic conductivity imposing remarkable influence on the general vulnerability of the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信