用落重偏转计评价刚性路面状况

M. M. Pradhan
{"title":"用落重偏转计评价刚性路面状况","authors":"M. M. Pradhan","doi":"10.1201/9781003078814-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper evaluation of the plain concrete rigid pavement is important for proper corrective maintenance. Often loss of load transfer and loss of support (LOS) are hard to predict. There are several ways to evaluate them. Currently they are identified by visual evaluation and faulting measurements. Most often slab jacking, grouting, and special material treatments are applied to correct the defect. But it is hard to measure effectiveness of such treatments. Presently, nondestructive tests such as Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) have been used to measure deflections of pavement to evaluate loss of load transfer and support. Some of the corrected slabs resulted in lesser load transfer efficiency. Again, the FWD analysis resulted in very poor load transfer efficiency in the pavements without any visible or substantial faulting. Five different load transfer efficiency computation methods were evaluated. The FWD deflection analysis used to evaluate the maintenance treatment on the corrected slabs resulted in mixed conclusion. Methods have been used in the evaluation of rigid pavement condition survey and apply appropriate application. The load transfer in the rigid pavement without dowel bar is due to aggregate interlock and base/subbase support. A method has been devised to evaluate the load transfer efficiency (LTE) and a criterion for LOS has been selected. Statistical analysis-of-variance was used to analyze significance of the different results. The result from this method reflected the true condition of the existing pavement and is recommended for the rigid-pavement-condition evaluation. The paper discussed in detail using the Utah rigid pavement system level data.","PeriodicalId":11581,"journal":{"name":"Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 1","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Rigid Pavement Condition Using Falling Weight Deflectometer\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Pradhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9781003078814-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proper evaluation of the plain concrete rigid pavement is important for proper corrective maintenance. Often loss of load transfer and loss of support (LOS) are hard to predict. There are several ways to evaluate them. Currently they are identified by visual evaluation and faulting measurements. Most often slab jacking, grouting, and special material treatments are applied to correct the defect. But it is hard to measure effectiveness of such treatments. Presently, nondestructive tests such as Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) have been used to measure deflections of pavement to evaluate loss of load transfer and support. Some of the corrected slabs resulted in lesser load transfer efficiency. Again, the FWD analysis resulted in very poor load transfer efficiency in the pavements without any visible or substantial faulting. Five different load transfer efficiency computation methods were evaluated. The FWD deflection analysis used to evaluate the maintenance treatment on the corrected slabs resulted in mixed conclusion. Methods have been used in the evaluation of rigid pavement condition survey and apply appropriate application. The load transfer in the rigid pavement without dowel bar is due to aggregate interlock and base/subbase support. A method has been devised to evaluate the load transfer efficiency (LTE) and a criterion for LOS has been selected. Statistical analysis-of-variance was used to analyze significance of the different results. The result from this method reflected the true condition of the existing pavement and is recommended for the rigid-pavement-condition evaluation. The paper discussed in detail using the Utah rigid pavement system level data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 1\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003078814-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003078814-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对素面混凝土刚性路面进行正确的评价对正确的养护具有重要意义。负荷转移损失和支撑损失(LOS)往往难以预测。有几种方法来评估它们。目前主要通过目视评价和断层测量来识别。通常采用顶板、灌浆和特殊材料处理来纠正缺陷。但是很难衡量这些治疗方法的有效性。目前,无损检测已被用于测量路面的挠度,以评估荷载传递和支撑的损失。一些修正后的楼板导致了较低的荷载传递效率。同样,FWD的分析结果表明,在没有任何明显或实质性断层的情况下,路面的荷载传递效率非常低。对五种不同的负荷转移效率计算方法进行了评价。用FWD挠度分析来评价对修正板的维护处理,得出了不同的结论。将该方法应用于刚性路面状况的评价,并进行了适当的应用。在刚性路面中,荷载传递主要是由于骨料联锁和基/底支撑作用。提出了一种评价负荷转移效率的方法,并选择了负荷转移效率的判据。采用统计学方差分析分析不同结果的显著性。该方法的结果反映了现有路面的真实状况,可用于路面刚性状况评价。本文利用犹他州刚性路面系统的水平数据进行了详细的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Rigid Pavement Condition Using Falling Weight Deflectometer
Proper evaluation of the plain concrete rigid pavement is important for proper corrective maintenance. Often loss of load transfer and loss of support (LOS) are hard to predict. There are several ways to evaluate them. Currently they are identified by visual evaluation and faulting measurements. Most often slab jacking, grouting, and special material treatments are applied to correct the defect. But it is hard to measure effectiveness of such treatments. Presently, nondestructive tests such as Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) have been used to measure deflections of pavement to evaluate loss of load transfer and support. Some of the corrected slabs resulted in lesser load transfer efficiency. Again, the FWD analysis resulted in very poor load transfer efficiency in the pavements without any visible or substantial faulting. Five different load transfer efficiency computation methods were evaluated. The FWD deflection analysis used to evaluate the maintenance treatment on the corrected slabs resulted in mixed conclusion. Methods have been used in the evaluation of rigid pavement condition survey and apply appropriate application. The load transfer in the rigid pavement without dowel bar is due to aggregate interlock and base/subbase support. A method has been devised to evaluate the load transfer efficiency (LTE) and a criterion for LOS has been selected. Statistical analysis-of-variance was used to analyze significance of the different results. The result from this method reflected the true condition of the existing pavement and is recommended for the rigid-pavement-condition evaluation. The paper discussed in detail using the Utah rigid pavement system level data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信