浅水带直列轴泵的潜水泵,油气行业海上应用的最佳选择

Shafir Mohammed, Ibrahim Kobbia
{"title":"浅水带直列轴泵的潜水泵,油气行业海上应用的最佳选择","authors":"Shafir Mohammed, Ibrahim Kobbia","doi":"10.2118/207881-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Seawater is an essential fluid used in various process circuits, such as cooling, reinjection into the wells and utilities, etc., in the offshore oil and gas industry. Vertical pumps facilitates with lifting seawater to the platform. This study investigates and compares two pump alternatives that has been widely used in oil and gas industry for seawater lift application: Vertical line-shaft pump and Electrical submersible pump.\n Existing seawater lift pump operating parameters are used as the basis of this study. The pump that is considered for the study has a flow rate of 3415 US GPM (776 m3/hr.) with a total head of 250 ft. The motor rating is 350 HP. The overall length of the pump is 21 meters. The main methodology used is a Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC) where the total cost of ownership of the vertical line-shaft pump and electrical submersible pump were analyzed for a period of 30 years. Furthermore, this research also addresses the operational drawbacks associated with both the pumps.\n Submersible pumps have higher initial capital investment cost when compared to line-shaft pump of similar capacity and size. The energy consumption cost of submersible pumps are higher mainly owing to lower efficiencies of the motors. The power factor for submersible pumps are lower in relation to line- shaft pumps. One of the main benefits of submersible pumps are their less installation and pump pullout time. Submersible pumps occupies lower space above ground when compared to line-shaft pumps. Additionally, submersible pumps are less noisy and have lower vibration in comparison to line-shaft pumps.\n This paper aims to provide key information and knowledge for engineers to make prudent decision regarding selection of the most cost effective pump for the seawater lift application with a tangible added cost value to both Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX).","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Submersible Pump with Line Shaft Pump in Shallow Water, Optimum Selection for Offshore Application in the Oil & Gas Industry\",\"authors\":\"Shafir Mohammed, Ibrahim Kobbia\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/207881-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Seawater is an essential fluid used in various process circuits, such as cooling, reinjection into the wells and utilities, etc., in the offshore oil and gas industry. Vertical pumps facilitates with lifting seawater to the platform. This study investigates and compares two pump alternatives that has been widely used in oil and gas industry for seawater lift application: Vertical line-shaft pump and Electrical submersible pump.\\n Existing seawater lift pump operating parameters are used as the basis of this study. The pump that is considered for the study has a flow rate of 3415 US GPM (776 m3/hr.) with a total head of 250 ft. The motor rating is 350 HP. The overall length of the pump is 21 meters. The main methodology used is a Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC) where the total cost of ownership of the vertical line-shaft pump and electrical submersible pump were analyzed for a period of 30 years. Furthermore, this research also addresses the operational drawbacks associated with both the pumps.\\n Submersible pumps have higher initial capital investment cost when compared to line-shaft pump of similar capacity and size. The energy consumption cost of submersible pumps are higher mainly owing to lower efficiencies of the motors. The power factor for submersible pumps are lower in relation to line- shaft pumps. One of the main benefits of submersible pumps are their less installation and pump pullout time. Submersible pumps occupies lower space above ground when compared to line-shaft pumps. Additionally, submersible pumps are less noisy and have lower vibration in comparison to line-shaft pumps.\\n This paper aims to provide key information and knowledge for engineers to make prudent decision regarding selection of the most cost effective pump for the seawater lift application with a tangible added cost value to both Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX).\",\"PeriodicalId\":10981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/207881-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207881-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在海上油气工业中,海水是各种工艺回路中必不可少的流体,例如冷却、回注井和公用设施等。立式泵有助于将海水提升到平台。本文对目前油气行业中广泛应用的两种海水举升泵进行了研究和比较:直立轴泵和电潜泵。本研究以现有海水举升泵运行参数为基础。研究中考虑的泵的流量为3415美国加仑/小时(776立方米/小时),总扬程为250英尺。电机额定功率为350马力。泵的总长度为21米。使用的主要方法是生命周期成本分析(LCC),其中对竖井泵和电潜泵的总拥有成本进行了为期30年的分析。此外,本研究还解决了与两种泵相关的操作缺陷。与同等容量和尺寸的直轴泵相比,潜水泵的初始投资成本较高。潜水泵的能耗成本较高,主要原因是电机效率较低。潜水泵的功率因数比直轴泵低。潜水泵的主要优点之一是安装和拔出泵的时间更少。与直轴泵相比,潜水泵在地面上占用的空间更小。此外,与直轴泵相比,潜水泵噪音更小,振动更低。本文旨在为工程师提供关键信息和知识,以便他们在为海水举升应用选择最具成本效益的泵时做出审慎的决策,这些泵在资本支出(CAPEX)和运营支出(OPEX)方面都有明显的成本增加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Submersible Pump with Line Shaft Pump in Shallow Water, Optimum Selection for Offshore Application in the Oil & Gas Industry
Seawater is an essential fluid used in various process circuits, such as cooling, reinjection into the wells and utilities, etc., in the offshore oil and gas industry. Vertical pumps facilitates with lifting seawater to the platform. This study investigates and compares two pump alternatives that has been widely used in oil and gas industry for seawater lift application: Vertical line-shaft pump and Electrical submersible pump. Existing seawater lift pump operating parameters are used as the basis of this study. The pump that is considered for the study has a flow rate of 3415 US GPM (776 m3/hr.) with a total head of 250 ft. The motor rating is 350 HP. The overall length of the pump is 21 meters. The main methodology used is a Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC) where the total cost of ownership of the vertical line-shaft pump and electrical submersible pump were analyzed for a period of 30 years. Furthermore, this research also addresses the operational drawbacks associated with both the pumps. Submersible pumps have higher initial capital investment cost when compared to line-shaft pump of similar capacity and size. The energy consumption cost of submersible pumps are higher mainly owing to lower efficiencies of the motors. The power factor for submersible pumps are lower in relation to line- shaft pumps. One of the main benefits of submersible pumps are their less installation and pump pullout time. Submersible pumps occupies lower space above ground when compared to line-shaft pumps. Additionally, submersible pumps are less noisy and have lower vibration in comparison to line-shaft pumps. This paper aims to provide key information and knowledge for engineers to make prudent decision regarding selection of the most cost effective pump for the seawater lift application with a tangible added cost value to both Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信