Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu20.2022.107
A. Zaitsev
{"title":"The Students of Panaetius in Philodemus’ Stoicorum Historia 74, 1–6","authors":"A. Zaitsev","doi":"10.21638/spbu20.2022.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares Cicero’s testimonies concerning Roman students of Panaetius with Philodemus’ tradition, which is accessible to us through his Stoicorum Historia. While Cicero associates prominent Roman politicians of the second century BC — among them P. Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus — with Panaetius in multiple testimonies, Philodemus only attests the study of the two Samnites Marcius and Nysius and the Roman Piso — all three of whom were probably politically insignificant — with Panaetius. This can be explained by the different intended audiences of the two authors: Cicero’s readers were primarily the Roman nobiles who were (occasionally) engaged in philosophy; Philodemus, on the other hand, was addressing the members of a Greek-speaking community of practicing philosophers. The fact that the testimonies do not coincide is thus no reason to deny their historicity. It seems more appropriate to accept the existence of Italic and Roman (professional) philosophers in addition to the politicians mentioned by Cicero who were students or friends of Panaitios.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2022.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将西塞罗关于帕纳提乌斯的罗马学生的证词与菲洛德摩斯的传统进行比较,我们可以通过他的《斯多伊orum Historia》了解到这一点。西塞罗将公元前2世纪的著名罗马政治家——其中包括P. Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus——与帕纳提乌斯联系在一起,而菲洛德摩斯只证明了两个萨谟奈人,马丘斯和尼修斯以及罗马人皮索——这三个人在政治上可能都是微不足道的——与帕纳提乌斯的研究。这可以用两位作者不同的目标读者来解释:西塞罗的读者主要是(偶尔)从事哲学的罗马贵族;另一方面,菲洛德摩斯是在向讲希腊语的实践哲学家团体的成员讲话。这些证词不一致的事实,因此没有理由否认它们的历史性。除了西塞罗提到的政治家之外,似乎更应该接受意大利和罗马(专业)哲学家的存在,他们是帕纳提奥斯的学生或朋友。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The Students of Panaetius in Philodemus’ Stoicorum Historia 74, 1–6
This article compares Cicero’s testimonies concerning Roman students of Panaetius with Philodemus’ tradition, which is accessible to us through his Stoicorum Historia. While Cicero associates prominent Roman politicians of the second century BC — among them P. Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus — with Panaetius in multiple testimonies, Philodemus only attests the study of the two Samnites Marcius and Nysius and the Roman Piso — all three of whom were probably politically insignificant — with Panaetius. This can be explained by the different intended audiences of the two authors: Cicero’s readers were primarily the Roman nobiles who were (occasionally) engaged in philosophy; Philodemus, on the other hand, was addressing the members of a Greek-speaking community of practicing philosophers. The fact that the testimonies do not coincide is thus no reason to deny their historicity. It seems more appropriate to accept the existence of Italic and Roman (professional) philosophers in addition to the politicians mentioned by Cicero who were students or friends of Panaitios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信