信息缺陷:权利计划的致命弱点

G. Bridge
{"title":"信息缺陷:权利计划的致命弱点","authors":"G. Bridge","doi":"10.1086/443430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entitlements have been proposed as a mechanism for financing an expanded national program of postsecondary education (e.g., Levin 1977; Kurland 1977; Nolfi 1977; Barton 1977). In theory, entitlement plans achieve greater economic efficiency and more social equity in access to education than current subsidy arrangements do because they cast suppliers and consumers of educational services in market relationships. That is, instead of giving direct subsidies to postsecondary schools, entitlement plans award vouchers-limited authorizations to spend public funds-to individuals so that they can purchase educational services from competing suppliers. Suppliers accept the vouchers as payment for services rendered, and the issuing agency redeems them for cash.","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"67 1","pages":"504 - 529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Imperfections: The Achilles' Heel of Entitlement Plans\",\"authors\":\"G. Bridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/443430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entitlements have been proposed as a mechanism for financing an expanded national program of postsecondary education (e.g., Levin 1977; Kurland 1977; Nolfi 1977; Barton 1977). In theory, entitlement plans achieve greater economic efficiency and more social equity in access to education than current subsidy arrangements do because they cast suppliers and consumers of educational services in market relationships. That is, instead of giving direct subsidies to postsecondary schools, entitlement plans award vouchers-limited authorizations to spend public funds-to individuals so that they can purchase educational services from competing suppliers. Suppliers accept the vouchers as payment for services rendered, and the issuing agency redeems them for cash.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"504 - 529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/443430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

权利已被提议作为一种为扩大的国家高等教育方案提供资金的机制(例如,Levin, 1977;当1977年;Nolfi 1977;巴顿1977)。理论上,权利计划在获得教育方面比现行补贴安排实现更高的经济效率和更多的社会公平,因为它们使教育服务的提供者和消费者处于市场关系中。也就是说,福利计划不是直接补贴高等学校,而是向个人发放代金券——有限的使用公共资金的授权——这样他们就可以从竞争供应商那里购买教育服务。供应商接受凭证作为提供服务的报酬,发证机构将凭证兑换成现金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Imperfections: The Achilles' Heel of Entitlement Plans
Entitlements have been proposed as a mechanism for financing an expanded national program of postsecondary education (e.g., Levin 1977; Kurland 1977; Nolfi 1977; Barton 1977). In theory, entitlement plans achieve greater economic efficiency and more social equity in access to education than current subsidy arrangements do because they cast suppliers and consumers of educational services in market relationships. That is, instead of giving direct subsidies to postsecondary schools, entitlement plans award vouchers-limited authorizations to spend public funds-to individuals so that they can purchase educational services from competing suppliers. Suppliers accept the vouchers as payment for services rendered, and the issuing agency redeems them for cash.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信