管理和未管理森林地区欧洲云杉树皮甲虫(鞘翅目:瓢虫科)病原菌感染水平的元数据分析

Forestry Journal Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/FORJ-2016-0023

Hana Vanická, K. Lukášová, J. Holuša

{"title":"管理和未管理森林地区欧洲云杉树皮甲虫(鞘翅目:瓢虫科)病原菌感染水平的元数据分析","authors":"Hana Vanická, K. Lukášová, J. Holuša","doi":"10.1515/FORJ-2016-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Forest management greatly affects the population density of the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. In this study, a meta-analysis was used to determine whether infection levels of pathogens of I. typographus differ between managed and unmanaged spruce stands. The analysis used data from 10 publications and a total of 61 locations. The results indicated that infection levels of the most common pathogens (ItEPV, Gregarina typographi, and Mattesia schwenkei) are higher in unmanaged than in managed locations. The only exception is the microsporidium Chytridiopsis typographi, which is more common in managed than in unmanaged locations. Our meta-analysis indicates that pathogen levels are generally higher in unmanaged than in managed locations.","PeriodicalId":56352,"journal":{"name":"Forestry Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"216 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection levels of pathogens in the European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at managed and unmanaged forest locations: a meta-data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hana Vanická, K. Lukášová, J. Holuša\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/FORJ-2016-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Forest management greatly affects the population density of the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. In this study, a meta-analysis was used to determine whether infection levels of pathogens of I. typographus differ between managed and unmanaged spruce stands. The analysis used data from 10 publications and a total of 61 locations. The results indicated that infection levels of the most common pathogens (ItEPV, Gregarina typographi, and Mattesia schwenkei) are higher in unmanaged than in managed locations. The only exception is the microsporidium Chytridiopsis typographi, which is more common in managed than in unmanaged locations. Our meta-analysis indicates that pathogen levels are generally higher in unmanaged than in managed locations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"216 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/FORJ-2016-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/FORJ-2016-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

森林管理对欧洲云杉树皮甲虫的种群密度有很大影响。在这项研究中，采用荟萃分析来确定管理和未管理云杉林分之间版式弧菌病原菌的感染水平是否存在差异。该分析使用了来自10份出版物和61个地点的数据。结果表明，最常见的病原体(ItEPV, Gregarina typographi和Mattesia schwenkei)的感染水平在未管理的地方比在管理的地方更高。唯一的例外是微孢子虫壶状芽孢杆菌，它在有管理的地方比在没有管理的地方更常见。我们的荟萃分析表明，在未受管理的地区，病原体水平通常高于有管理的地区。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Infection levels of pathogens in the European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) at managed and unmanaged forest locations: a meta-data analysis

Abstract Forest management greatly affects the population density of the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. In this study, a meta-analysis was used to determine whether infection levels of pathogens of I. typographus differ between managed and unmanaged spruce stands. The analysis used data from 10 publications and a total of 61 locations. The results indicated that infection levels of the most common pathogens (ItEPV, Gregarina typographi, and Mattesia schwenkei) are higher in unmanaged than in managed locations. The only exception is the microsporidium Chytridiopsis typographi, which is more common in managed than in unmanaged locations. Our meta-analysis indicates that pathogen levels are generally higher in unmanaged than in managed locations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Forestry Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

4 weeks

期刊介绍： Central European Forestry Journal (published as Lesnícky Èasopis - Forestry Journal until 2016) publishes novel science originating from research in forestry and related braches. Central European Forestry Journal is a professional peer-reviewed scientific journal published 4-time a year. The journal contains original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related disciplines. The editorial office accepts the manuscripts within the focus of the journal exclusively in English language. The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. Central European Forestry Journal, abbreviation: Cent. Eur. For. J., publishes original papers and review papers of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry and related scientific areas. The journal focuses on forestry issues relevant for Europe, primarily Central European regions. Original works and review papers can be submitted only in English language.