破坏法和海绵拭法牛肉胴体指标生物计数的比较

Mitsushi Kobayashi, Kouji Furuuchi, Jin Onodera, F. Koike, Yoshiriho Tsuji, M. Nagase, Y. Morita, H. Toyofuku
{"title":"破坏法和海绵拭法牛肉胴体指标生物计数的比较","authors":"Mitsushi Kobayashi, Kouji Furuuchi, Jin Onodera, F. Koike, Yoshiriho Tsuji, M. Nagase, Y. Morita, H. Toyofuku","doi":"10.12935/jvma.75.e24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared total aerobic plate counts (APC) and Enterobacteriaceae counts on Japanese black cattle ( wagyu ) carcasses obtained by a destructive method and a sponge swabbing method. A total of 60 samples were collected by each method in both winter (January – March 2020) and summer (July – September 2020). Each sample obtained by the destructive method was 20 cm 2 (about 10 g) of carcass surface from four different parts (rump, top flank, bottom flank, and brisket), each of which were 5 cm 2 . The samples obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 400 cm 2 , swabbed at the surface of the same four parts, and were 100 cm 2 each. The mean ± standard deviation of the APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts obtained by the destructive method were 1.50 ± 0.79 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.44 ± 0.21 log cfu/cm 2 , respectively, while those obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 1.00 ± 0.48 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.29 ± 0.12 log cfu/cm 2 . APC obtained by the destructive sampling method were significantly higher than those obtained by the sponge swabbing method ( P < 0.01). There were no sea-sonal differences in APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts between the two sampling methods. The linear regres-sion equation of APC obtained by the destructive and sponge swabbing methods was y = 0.25 x + 0.62, and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.17. The correlation of APC between the destructive method and the sponge swabbing method seemed to be low.","PeriodicalId":17329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association","volume":"49 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Indicator Organism Counts on Beef Carcass Obtained by Destructive and Sponge Swabbing Methods\",\"authors\":\"Mitsushi Kobayashi, Kouji Furuuchi, Jin Onodera, F. Koike, Yoshiriho Tsuji, M. Nagase, Y. Morita, H. Toyofuku\",\"doi\":\"10.12935/jvma.75.e24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared total aerobic plate counts (APC) and Enterobacteriaceae counts on Japanese black cattle ( wagyu ) carcasses obtained by a destructive method and a sponge swabbing method. A total of 60 samples were collected by each method in both winter (January – March 2020) and summer (July – September 2020). Each sample obtained by the destructive method was 20 cm 2 (about 10 g) of carcass surface from four different parts (rump, top flank, bottom flank, and brisket), each of which were 5 cm 2 . The samples obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 400 cm 2 , swabbed at the surface of the same four parts, and were 100 cm 2 each. The mean ± standard deviation of the APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts obtained by the destructive method were 1.50 ± 0.79 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.44 ± 0.21 log cfu/cm 2 , respectively, while those obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 1.00 ± 0.48 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.29 ± 0.12 log cfu/cm 2 . APC obtained by the destructive sampling method were significantly higher than those obtained by the sponge swabbing method ( P < 0.01). There were no sea-sonal differences in APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts between the two sampling methods. The linear regres-sion equation of APC obtained by the destructive and sponge swabbing methods was y = 0.25 x + 0.62, and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.17. The correlation of APC between the destructive method and the sponge swabbing method seemed to be low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"49 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma.75.e24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma.75.e24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用破坏法和海绵拭子法对日本黑牛(和牛)尸体进行了好氧平板总计数(APC)和肠杆菌科计数的比较。在冬季(2020年1 - 3月)和夏季(2020年7 - 9月),每种方法共采集60份样本。采用破坏法从胴体4个不同部位(臀部、上腹、下腹和胸脯)取5 cm 2的样品,每个样品20 cm 2(约10 g)。海绵拭子法获得的样品为400 cm 2,在相同的四个部分表面拭子,各为100 cm 2。破坏法APC和Enterobacteriaceae计数的平均值±标准差分别为1.50±0.79 log cfu/cm 2和0.44±0.21 log cfu/cm 2,海绵拭法APC和Enterobacteriaceae计数的平均值±标准差分别为1.00±0.48 log cfu/cm 2和0.29±0.12 log cfu/cm 2。破坏性取样法测得的APC显著高于海绵拭法(P < 0.01)。两种采样方法间APC和enterobacteraceae计数无海区差异。破坏法和海绵法测定APC的线性回归方程为y = 0.25 x + 0.62,决定系数(r2)为0.17。破坏法与海绵拭法APC的相关性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Indicator Organism Counts on Beef Carcass Obtained by Destructive and Sponge Swabbing Methods
We compared total aerobic plate counts (APC) and Enterobacteriaceae counts on Japanese black cattle ( wagyu ) carcasses obtained by a destructive method and a sponge swabbing method. A total of 60 samples were collected by each method in both winter (January – March 2020) and summer (July – September 2020). Each sample obtained by the destructive method was 20 cm 2 (about 10 g) of carcass surface from four different parts (rump, top flank, bottom flank, and brisket), each of which were 5 cm 2 . The samples obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 400 cm 2 , swabbed at the surface of the same four parts, and were 100 cm 2 each. The mean ± standard deviation of the APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts obtained by the destructive method were 1.50 ± 0.79 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.44 ± 0.21 log cfu/cm 2 , respectively, while those obtained by the sponge swabbing method were 1.00 ± 0.48 log cfu/cm 2 and 0.29 ± 0.12 log cfu/cm 2 . APC obtained by the destructive sampling method were significantly higher than those obtained by the sponge swabbing method ( P < 0.01). There were no sea-sonal differences in APC and Enterobacteriaceae counts between the two sampling methods. The linear regres-sion equation of APC obtained by the destructive and sponge swabbing methods was y = 0.25 x + 0.62, and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.17. The correlation of APC between the destructive method and the sponge swabbing method seemed to be low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信