第二章:国防统计比较

Q3 Social Sciences

The Military Balance Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791

{"title":"第二章:国防统计比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a Includes Armed Forces Pension Scheme; b Total defence expenditure including National Guard, Federal Border Service and military pensions; c Excludes security expenditure; d Includes US Foreign Military Assistance. Note: US dollar totals are calculated using average market exchange rates for 2020, derived using IMF data. The relative position of countries will vary not only as a result of actual adjustments in defence spending levels, but also due to exchange-rate uctuations between domestic currencies and the US dollar. The use of average exchange rates reduces these uctuations, but the effects of such movements can be signi cant in a number of cases. Security spending removed from Middle East estimates (including Saudi Arabia and Iraq). Armed Forces Pension Scheme and Special Appropriations (pensions) added to UK and Australia budgets respectively.","PeriodicalId":35165,"journal":{"name":"The Military Balance","volume":"10 1","pages":"23 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter Two: Comparative defence statistics\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"a Includes Armed Forces Pension Scheme; b Total defence expenditure including National Guard, Federal Border Service and military pensions; c Excludes security expenditure; d Includes US Foreign Military Assistance. Note: US dollar totals are calculated using average market exchange rates for 2020, derived using IMF data. The relative position of countries will vary not only as a result of actual adjustments in defence spending levels, but also due to exchange-rate uctuations between domestic currencies and the US dollar. The use of average exchange rates reduces these uctuations, but the effects of such movements can be signi cant in a number of cases. Security spending removed from Middle East estimates (including Saudi Arabia and Iraq). Armed Forces Pension Scheme and Special Appropriations (pensions) added to UK and Australia budgets respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Military Balance\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Military Balance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Military Balance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

a包括武装部队养恤金计划;b国防开支总额，包括国民警卫队、联邦边防局和军人养恤金;c不包括保安开支;d包括美国对外军事援助。注:美元总额是根据国际货币基金组织的数据，根据2020年的平均市场汇率计算得出的。各国的相对地位不仅会因国防开支水平的实际调整而有所不同，还会因本国货币与美元之间的汇率波动而有所不同。平均汇率的使用减少了这些波动，但在许多情况下，这种波动的影响可能是显著的。从中东估计(包括沙特阿拉伯和伊拉克)中删除安全支出。武装部队养老金计划和特别拨款(养老金)分别增加到英国和澳大利亚的预算中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Chapter Two: Comparative defence statistics

a Includes Armed Forces Pension Scheme; b Total defence expenditure including National Guard, Federal Border Service and military pensions; c Excludes security expenditure; d Includes US Foreign Military Assistance. Note: US dollar totals are calculated using average market exchange rates for 2020, derived using IMF data. The relative position of countries will vary not only as a result of actual adjustments in defence spending levels, but also due to exchange-rate uctuations between domestic currencies and the US dollar. The use of average exchange rates reduces these uctuations, but the effects of such movements can be signi cant in a number of cases. Security spending removed from Middle East estimates (including Saudi Arabia and Iraq). Armed Forces Pension Scheme and Special Appropriations (pensions) added to UK and Australia budgets respectively.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Military Balance Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量