我们应该相信大学的非正式学术吗?一个叙述性调查案例研究

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Loo
{"title":"我们应该相信大学的非正式学术吗?一个叙述性调查案例研究","authors":"D. Loo","doi":"10.1177/00345237231169453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how trust is established by a casual academic working at a Malaysian public university. Narrative data was collected through a series of semi-structured interview with a case participant, Dinah. The data was analyzed in light of priori themes derived from existing literature about casual academics at the university. The analysis illustrated two themes of how trust is established. First, trust is established through the entrepreneurial self, seen through the recognition of one’s pedagogical knowledge and classroom experience. Second, trust is established through a combination of compliance and non-compliance. The former refers to meeting the expectations of the institution, while the latter refers to the casual academic’s personal rationalization of what is deemed best for the students. Based on these findings, trust for the casual academic was found to be a multidimensional construct that was not necessarily bound to performative metrics, unlike their full-time counterparts. Furthermore, due to grey areas in oversight, there may be more opportunities for casual academics to teach on the basis of morality.","PeriodicalId":45813,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should we trust the university casual academic? A narrative inquiry case study\",\"authors\":\"D. Loo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00345237231169453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores how trust is established by a casual academic working at a Malaysian public university. Narrative data was collected through a series of semi-structured interview with a case participant, Dinah. The data was analyzed in light of priori themes derived from existing literature about casual academics at the university. The analysis illustrated two themes of how trust is established. First, trust is established through the entrepreneurial self, seen through the recognition of one’s pedagogical knowledge and classroom experience. Second, trust is established through a combination of compliance and non-compliance. The former refers to meeting the expectations of the institution, while the latter refers to the casual academic’s personal rationalization of what is deemed best for the students. Based on these findings, trust for the casual academic was found to be a multidimensional construct that was not necessarily bound to performative metrics, unlike their full-time counterparts. Furthermore, due to grey areas in oversight, there may be more opportunities for casual academics to teach on the basis of morality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231169453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237231169453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了一名在马来西亚公立大学工作的非正式学者如何建立信任。叙述性数据是通过对案例参与者Dinah的一系列半结构化访谈收集的。这些数据是根据现有文献中关于大学非正式学者的先验主题进行分析的。分析说明了如何建立信任的两个主题。首先,信任是通过创业自我建立的,通过对一个人的教学知识和课堂经验的认可来体现。第二,信任是通过遵守和不遵守的结合来建立的。前者指的是满足机构的期望,而后者指的是随意的学者对学生认为最好的东西的个人合理化。基于这些发现,我们发现,与全职学者不同,对非正式学者的信任是一个多维结构,不一定与绩效指标挂钩。此外,由于监管中的灰色地带,可能会有更多的机会让非正式学者在道德的基础上进行教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should we trust the university casual academic? A narrative inquiry case study
This study explores how trust is established by a casual academic working at a Malaysian public university. Narrative data was collected through a series of semi-structured interview with a case participant, Dinah. The data was analyzed in light of priori themes derived from existing literature about casual academics at the university. The analysis illustrated two themes of how trust is established. First, trust is established through the entrepreneurial self, seen through the recognition of one’s pedagogical knowledge and classroom experience. Second, trust is established through a combination of compliance and non-compliance. The former refers to meeting the expectations of the institution, while the latter refers to the casual academic’s personal rationalization of what is deemed best for the students. Based on these findings, trust for the casual academic was found to be a multidimensional construct that was not necessarily bound to performative metrics, unlike their full-time counterparts. Furthermore, due to grey areas in oversight, there may be more opportunities for casual academics to teach on the basis of morality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Education
Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Research in Education has an established focus on the sociology and psychology of education and gives increased emphasis to current practical issues of direct interest to those in the teaching profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信