使用AHP - TOPSIS方法选择领先的消费品物流供应商

Kuwat Suroto, H. Hasbullah
{"title":"使用AHP - TOPSIS方法选择领先的消费品物流供应商","authors":"Kuwat Suroto, H. Hasbullah","doi":"10.22441/sinergi.2023.2.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vendor selection is a strategic activity in order to support the achievement of the company`s success and competitiveness. Significantly, the company has some specific standards in the selection. Therefore, evaluation is needed to see which vendors match the company's criteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and select the proposed vendor in a decision support system using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. The AHP method is used to determine the importance of the criteria, while the TOPSIS method is used to rank alternatives. The results show that Provider 1 has the highest score compared to other alternatives with a value of 0.852. Sensitivity analysis shows that the proposed AHP and TOPSIS methods are robust, suitable for this problem, and have a low rate of change.","PeriodicalId":31051,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection lead logistics provider in consumer goods using AHP – TOPSIS approach\",\"authors\":\"Kuwat Suroto, H. Hasbullah\",\"doi\":\"10.22441/sinergi.2023.2.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vendor selection is a strategic activity in order to support the achievement of the company`s success and competitiveness. Significantly, the company has some specific standards in the selection. Therefore, evaluation is needed to see which vendors match the company's criteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and select the proposed vendor in a decision support system using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. The AHP method is used to determine the importance of the criteria, while the TOPSIS method is used to rank alternatives. The results show that Provider 1 has the highest score compared to other alternatives with a value of 0.852. Sensitivity analysis shows that the proposed AHP and TOPSIS methods are robust, suitable for this problem, and have a low rate of change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2023.2.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah SINERGI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2023.2.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

供应商选择是一项战略活动,以支持实现公司的成功和竞争力。值得注意的是,该公司在选择方面有一些具体的标准。因此,需要进行评估,以确定哪些供应商符合公司的标准。本研究的目的是使用AHP和TOPSIS方法在决策支持系统中评估和选择建议的供应商。AHP方法用于确定标准的重要性,而TOPSIS方法用于对备选方案进行排序。结果表明,供应商1与其他备选方案相比得分最高,为0.852。灵敏度分析表明,所提出的AHP和TOPSIS方法具有较好的鲁棒性和较低的变化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection lead logistics provider in consumer goods using AHP – TOPSIS approach
Vendor selection is a strategic activity in order to support the achievement of the company`s success and competitiveness. Significantly, the company has some specific standards in the selection. Therefore, evaluation is needed to see which vendors match the company's criteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and select the proposed vendor in a decision support system using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. The AHP method is used to determine the importance of the criteria, while the TOPSIS method is used to rank alternatives. The results show that Provider 1 has the highest score compared to other alternatives with a value of 0.852. Sensitivity analysis shows that the proposed AHP and TOPSIS methods are robust, suitable for this problem, and have a low rate of change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信