社会媒体、错误信息和政治两极分化时代的言论自由概论

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Eitan Hersh, Yanna Krupnikov
{"title":"社会媒体、错误信息和政治两极分化时代的言论自由概论","authors":"Eitan Hersh, Yanna Krupnikov","doi":"10.1017/S1049096522001275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January 2022, the Knight Foundation released a study of American attitudes toward freedom of expression, which builds on regular student surveys that the foundation has conducted since 2004. With three other scholars (i.e., Katherine Glenn Bass of Columbia University; Daron Shaw of the University of Texas at Austin; and David Wilson of the University of California, Berkeley), we served as advisors in the development of the national survey of 4,000 Americans that was fielded jointly by Knight and Ipsos. The Knight Foundation study paints a complicated portrait of American public opinion regarding speech and expression, with wide gaps between support for freedom of expression in the abstract and support for particular examples of expression. As part of this study, we put out a call in early 2021 to scholars to submit proposals for experiments that consider how people perceive different dimensions of freedom of expression. The preregistered experiments that we selected, which were fielded by Ipsos along with the Knight survey, reach the heart of the way people translate abstract support into political attitudes and behaviors. This symposium presents the (often-unexpected) findings of these studies. Ranging in topic from police suppression of protests to “flagging” inappropriate content on social media to self-censorship, the experiments measure how identities of speakers, content of speech, and identities of the audience all intersect to affect the way that people apply and understand freedom of expression.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Freedom of Expression in an Age of Social Media, Misinformation, and Political Polarization\",\"authors\":\"Eitan Hersh, Yanna Krupnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1049096522001275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In January 2022, the Knight Foundation released a study of American attitudes toward freedom of expression, which builds on regular student surveys that the foundation has conducted since 2004. With three other scholars (i.e., Katherine Glenn Bass of Columbia University; Daron Shaw of the University of Texas at Austin; and David Wilson of the University of California, Berkeley), we served as advisors in the development of the national survey of 4,000 Americans that was fielded jointly by Knight and Ipsos. The Knight Foundation study paints a complicated portrait of American public opinion regarding speech and expression, with wide gaps between support for freedom of expression in the abstract and support for particular examples of expression. As part of this study, we put out a call in early 2021 to scholars to submit proposals for experiments that consider how people perceive different dimensions of freedom of expression. The preregistered experiments that we selected, which were fielded by Ipsos along with the Knight survey, reach the heart of the way people translate abstract support into political attitudes and behaviors. This symposium presents the (often-unexpected) findings of these studies. Ranging in topic from police suppression of protests to “flagging” inappropriate content on social media to self-censorship, the experiments measure how identities of speakers, content of speech, and identities of the audience all intersect to affect the way that people apply and understand freedom of expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年1月,奈特基金会(Knight Foundation)发布了一项关于美国人对言论自由态度的研究,该研究基于该基金会自2004年以来定期对学生进行的调查。与其他三位学者(即哥伦比亚大学的凯瑟琳·格伦·巴斯;德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校的Daron Shaw;和加州大学伯克利分校的大卫·威尔逊),我们在奈特和益普索联合对4000名美国人进行的全国调查的发展中担任顾问。奈特基金会的研究描绘了一幅关于言论和表达的美国公众舆论的复杂图景,在支持抽象的表达自由和支持具体的表达例子之间存在着巨大的差距。作为这项研究的一部分,我们在2021年初呼吁学者们提交实验提案,考虑人们如何看待不同维度的言论自由。我们选择的预先注册的实验是由益普索和奈特调查一起进行的,它们触及了人们将抽象的支持转化为政治态度和行为的方式的核心。本次研讨会将介绍这些研究的(通常出乎意料的)发现。从警察镇压抗议活动到在社交媒体上“标记”不适当的内容,再到自我审查,这些实验的主题包括演讲者的身份、言论内容和听众的身份如何相互影响,从而影响人们应用和理解言论自由的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to Freedom of Expression in an Age of Social Media, Misinformation, and Political Polarization
In January 2022, the Knight Foundation released a study of American attitudes toward freedom of expression, which builds on regular student surveys that the foundation has conducted since 2004. With three other scholars (i.e., Katherine Glenn Bass of Columbia University; Daron Shaw of the University of Texas at Austin; and David Wilson of the University of California, Berkeley), we served as advisors in the development of the national survey of 4,000 Americans that was fielded jointly by Knight and Ipsos. The Knight Foundation study paints a complicated portrait of American public opinion regarding speech and expression, with wide gaps between support for freedom of expression in the abstract and support for particular examples of expression. As part of this study, we put out a call in early 2021 to scholars to submit proposals for experiments that consider how people perceive different dimensions of freedom of expression. The preregistered experiments that we selected, which were fielded by Ipsos along with the Knight survey, reach the heart of the way people translate abstract support into political attitudes and behaviors. This symposium presents the (often-unexpected) findings of these studies. Ranging in topic from police suppression of protests to “flagging” inappropriate content on social media to self-censorship, the experiments measure how identities of speakers, content of speech, and identities of the audience all intersect to affect the way that people apply and understand freedom of expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ps-Political Science & Politics
Ps-Political Science & Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: PS: Political Science & Politics provides critical analyses of contemporary political phenomena and is the journal of record for the discipline of political science reporting on research, teaching, and professional development. PS, begun in 1968, is the only quarterly professional news and commentary journal in the field and is the prime source of information on political scientists" achievements and professional concerns. PS: Political Science & Politics is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with American Political Science Review and Perspectives on Politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信