反思社区发展研究:同行研究人员如何影响和塑造社区行动项目

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Elaine Arnull, M. Kanjilal
{"title":"反思社区发展研究:同行研究人员如何影响和塑造社区行动项目","authors":"Elaine Arnull, M. Kanjilal","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsac013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores how the selection of peer researchers influences and shapes peer research projects. It draws on two empirical studies formed from two community action projects in England. Peer research is a method for involving young people as coresearchers within their community or in specific settings such as educational environments and the two projects recruited school children of different ages and ethnic backgrounds; in both cases they were representative of the potential participant population. One project (Community House) was based in a junior school setting and concentrated on evaluating a community centre project. The second project (Knife Angel: Hear My Voice) was a youth work setting and brought together a group of young people to explore an intervention aimed at impacting crime and violence in the local community.\n This paper discusses how the demographic characteristics of the peer researchers shaped, influenced and impacted the success of both community action projects. We discuss how children and young people bring their unique skills to preparing the questionnaire and dissemination. Using researcher reflexivity, we consider the methodological implications of the findings and contribute to theory building about community action and the impact of participatory research.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"473 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting on community development research: how peer researchers influence and shape community action projects\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Arnull, M. Kanjilal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cdj/bsac013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores how the selection of peer researchers influences and shapes peer research projects. It draws on two empirical studies formed from two community action projects in England. Peer research is a method for involving young people as coresearchers within their community or in specific settings such as educational environments and the two projects recruited school children of different ages and ethnic backgrounds; in both cases they were representative of the potential participant population. One project (Community House) was based in a junior school setting and concentrated on evaluating a community centre project. The second project (Knife Angel: Hear My Voice) was a youth work setting and brought together a group of young people to explore an intervention aimed at impacting crime and violence in the local community.\\n This paper discusses how the demographic characteristics of the peer researchers shaped, influenced and impacted the success of both community action projects. We discuss how children and young people bring their unique skills to preparing the questionnaire and dissemination. Using researcher reflexivity, we consider the methodological implications of the findings and contribute to theory building about community action and the impact of participatory research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"473 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了同伴研究人员的选择如何影响和塑造同伴研究项目。它借鉴了英国两个社区行动项目形成的两项实证研究。同伴研究是一种让年轻人在其社区或特定环境(如教育环境)中作为共同研究人员参与的方法,这两个项目招募了不同年龄和种族背景的学童;在这两种情况下,他们都代表了潜在的参与者群体。其中一个项目(社区之家)以一所初中为基础,重点是评估一个社区中心项目。第二个项目(刀天使:听到我的声音)是一个青年工作环境,汇集了一群年轻人,探索旨在影响当地社区犯罪和暴力的干预措施。本文讨论了同行研究人员的人口统计学特征如何塑造、影响和影响了这两个社区行动项目的成功。我们讨论了儿童和年轻人如何将他们的独特技能用于准备问卷和分发。利用研究者的反身性,我们考虑了研究结果的方法论含义,并为社区行动和参与式研究的影响的理论建设做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflecting on community development research: how peer researchers influence and shape community action projects
This paper explores how the selection of peer researchers influences and shapes peer research projects. It draws on two empirical studies formed from two community action projects in England. Peer research is a method for involving young people as coresearchers within their community or in specific settings such as educational environments and the two projects recruited school children of different ages and ethnic backgrounds; in both cases they were representative of the potential participant population. One project (Community House) was based in a junior school setting and concentrated on evaluating a community centre project. The second project (Knife Angel: Hear My Voice) was a youth work setting and brought together a group of young people to explore an intervention aimed at impacting crime and violence in the local community. This paper discusses how the demographic characteristics of the peer researchers shaped, influenced and impacted the success of both community action projects. We discuss how children and young people bring their unique skills to preparing the questionnaire and dissemination. Using researcher reflexivity, we consider the methodological implications of the findings and contribute to theory building about community action and the impact of participatory research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信