流离失所和不安全:移民-殖民种族资本主义在美国租赁市场的遗产

Elizabeth Korver‐Glenn, Sofia Locklear, Junia Howell, Ellen M. Whitehead
{"title":"流离失所和不安全:移民-殖民种族资本主义在美国租赁市场的遗产","authors":"Elizabeth Korver‐Glenn, Sofia Locklear, Junia Howell, Ellen M. Whitehead","doi":"10.1080/26884674.2023.2176799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Unsafe rental units are disproportionately located in communities of color, resulting in numerous detrimental effects for residents’ health and socioeconomic well-being. Yet, scholars disagree regarding the mechanisms driving this phenomenon. Exogenous capitalism theories emphasize socioeconomic factors while setter-colonial racial capitalism theories emphasize the racist policies and practices that incentivize unequal investment and maintenance. We empirically adjudicate between these mechanisms by merging restricted-access versions of the American Housing Survey, the Rental Housing Finance Survey, and the American Community Survey at a Census Restricted Data Center. Our findings demonstrate neighborhood White proportion is a key mechanism shaping the condition of rental units even when controlling for neighborhood socioeconomic status, property features, and renter demographics. We argue these results support settler-colonial racial capitalism theories and discuss the implications of these findings for future research and housing policy.","PeriodicalId":73921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of race, ethnicity and the city","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Displaced and unsafe: The legacy of settler-colonial racial capitalism in the U.S. rental market\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Korver‐Glenn, Sofia Locklear, Junia Howell, Ellen M. Whitehead\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26884674.2023.2176799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Unsafe rental units are disproportionately located in communities of color, resulting in numerous detrimental effects for residents’ health and socioeconomic well-being. Yet, scholars disagree regarding the mechanisms driving this phenomenon. Exogenous capitalism theories emphasize socioeconomic factors while setter-colonial racial capitalism theories emphasize the racist policies and practices that incentivize unequal investment and maintenance. We empirically adjudicate between these mechanisms by merging restricted-access versions of the American Housing Survey, the Rental Housing Finance Survey, and the American Community Survey at a Census Restricted Data Center. Our findings demonstrate neighborhood White proportion is a key mechanism shaping the condition of rental units even when controlling for neighborhood socioeconomic status, property features, and renter demographics. We argue these results support settler-colonial racial capitalism theories and discuss the implications of these findings for future research and housing policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of race, ethnicity and the city\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of race, ethnicity and the city\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26884674.2023.2176799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of race, ethnicity and the city","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26884674.2023.2176799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不安全的租赁单元不成比例地分布在有色人种社区,对居民的健康和社会经济福祉造成了许多不利影响。然而,学者们对推动这一现象的机制存在分歧。外生资本主义理论强调社会经济因素,而殖民种族资本主义理论强调种族主义政策和做法,激励不平等的投资和维护。我们通过合并限制访问版本的美国住房调查、租赁住房金融调查和人口普查限制数据中心的美国社区调查,在这些机制之间进行经验判断。我们的研究结果表明,即使在控制社区社会经济地位、财产特征和租房者人口统计数据的情况下,社区白人比例也是塑造租赁单元条件的关键机制。我们认为这些结果支持定居者-殖民地种族资本主义理论,并讨论了这些发现对未来研究和住房政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Displaced and unsafe: The legacy of settler-colonial racial capitalism in the U.S. rental market
ABSTRACT Unsafe rental units are disproportionately located in communities of color, resulting in numerous detrimental effects for residents’ health and socioeconomic well-being. Yet, scholars disagree regarding the mechanisms driving this phenomenon. Exogenous capitalism theories emphasize socioeconomic factors while setter-colonial racial capitalism theories emphasize the racist policies and practices that incentivize unequal investment and maintenance. We empirically adjudicate between these mechanisms by merging restricted-access versions of the American Housing Survey, the Rental Housing Finance Survey, and the American Community Survey at a Census Restricted Data Center. Our findings demonstrate neighborhood White proportion is a key mechanism shaping the condition of rental units even when controlling for neighborhood socioeconomic status, property features, and renter demographics. We argue these results support settler-colonial racial capitalism theories and discuss the implications of these findings for future research and housing policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信