{"title":"Die Neue Fries’sche Schule versus Neukantianismus","authors":"A. Noras, T. Kubalica","doi":"10.31261/fp.13796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this article is the divergences between the various directions and phases of Neo-Kantianism. It is an attempt to answer the question of why there were heated polemics between the representatives of the different approaches, although in principle they thought alike. In the author’s opinion, neo-Kantianism is a problem in itself and therefore it is difficult to find a uniform definition of neo-Kantianism.","PeriodicalId":34263,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Philosophica","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/fp.13796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The subject of this article is the divergences between the various directions and phases of Neo-Kantianism. It is an attempt to answer the question of why there were heated polemics between the representatives of the different approaches, although in principle they thought alike. In the author’s opinion, neo-Kantianism is a problem in itself and therefore it is difficult to find a uniform definition of neo-Kantianism.