重新审视东南亚的权力观念

IF 0.9 3区社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY

Anthropological Forum Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00664677.2022.2052016

H. Jonsson

{"title":"重新审视东南亚的权力观念","authors":"H. Jonsson","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2022.2052016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The five essays in this collection examine ideas of power in Southeast Asia and reflect on foundational studies by Lucien Hanks and Benedict Anderson on Thailand and Indonesia. The essays by Hanks and Anderson crossed anthropology and area studies. The cases explore the relevance of their work in Southeast Asia and comparatively, in relation to academic consensus and debate, social entanglements, political divergence, negotiation, pluralism, and reflexivity. The essays suggest that ‘the state’ is a problematic notion, and that the common conflation of society and the state hides a range of tensions between the rival principles of hierarchy and community. We examine power in relation to socialism, hierarchy, indigeneity, Buddhism, marginalisation, and nonstate identities, through fieldwork encounters as much as through historical and regional contrasts and comparisons on the ethnic frontiers of the modern nations of Indonesia, Laos, and Thailand.","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"60 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Ideas of Power in Southeast Asia\",\"authors\":\"H. Jonsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00664677.2022.2052016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The five essays in this collection examine ideas of power in Southeast Asia and reflect on foundational studies by Lucien Hanks and Benedict Anderson on Thailand and Indonesia. The essays by Hanks and Anderson crossed anthropology and area studies. The cases explore the relevance of their work in Southeast Asia and comparatively, in relation to academic consensus and debate, social entanglements, political divergence, negotiation, pluralism, and reflexivity. The essays suggest that ‘the state’ is a problematic notion, and that the common conflation of society and the state hides a range of tensions between the rival principles of hierarchy and community. We examine power in relation to socialism, hierarchy, indigeneity, Buddhism, marginalisation, and nonstate identities, through fieldwork encounters as much as through historical and regional contrasts and comparisons on the ethnic frontiers of the modern nations of Indonesia, Laos, and Thailand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Forum\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2052016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2052016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文集中的五篇文章考察了东南亚的权力观念，并反思了吕西安·汉克斯和本尼迪克特·安德森对泰国和印度尼西亚的基础研究。汉克斯和安德森的论文跨越了人类学和区域研究。这些案例探讨了他们在东南亚工作的相关性，以及与学术共识和辩论、社会纠缠、政治分歧、谈判、多元化和反身性的关系。这些文章表明，“国家”是一个有问题的概念，社会和国家的普遍合并隐藏了等级制度和社区对立原则之间的一系列紧张关系。我们通过实地考察与社会主义、等级制度、土著、佛教、边缘化和非国家身份相关的权力，以及通过对印度尼西亚、老挝和泰国现代国家种族边界的历史和区域对比和比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Revisiting Ideas of Power in Southeast Asia

ABSTRACT The five essays in this collection examine ideas of power in Southeast Asia and reflect on foundational studies by Lucien Hanks and Benedict Anderson on Thailand and Indonesia. The essays by Hanks and Anderson crossed anthropology and area studies. The cases explore the relevance of their work in Southeast Asia and comparatively, in relation to academic consensus and debate, social entanglements, political divergence, negotiation, pluralism, and reflexivity. The essays suggest that ‘the state’ is a problematic notion, and that the common conflation of society and the state hides a range of tensions between the rival principles of hierarchy and community. We examine power in relation to socialism, hierarchy, indigeneity, Buddhism, marginalisation, and nonstate identities, through fieldwork encounters as much as through historical and regional contrasts and comparisons on the ethnic frontiers of the modern nations of Indonesia, Laos, and Thailand.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.