角蛋白纤维杨氏模量测量方法的比较

W. S. Simpson
{"title":"角蛋白纤维杨氏模量测量方法的比较","authors":"W. S. Simpson","doi":"10.1080/19447026508662325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...","PeriodicalId":17650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"51—A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF YOUNG'S MODULUS FOR KERATIN FIBRES\",\"authors\":\"W. S. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19447026508662325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...\",\"PeriodicalId\":17650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19447026508662325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19447026508662325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

杨氏模量已经通过各种方法对几种类型的角蛋白纤维进行了测量,包括“静态”或负载扩展方法,振荡梁和振荡纤维悬臂。结论是,从低频振荡梁得到的纤维拉伸杨氏模量略高于从“静态”测量得到的杨氏模量,这种差异可能是由于加工硬化效应的贡献和模量定义的实际差异以及低频时的小频率依赖性造成的。另一方面,弯曲的杨氏模量不能与简单的扩展结果一致。高频纵向结果也不同于本文报道的低频值,大概是因为,在高频情况下,只涉及最强的化学键,而在相对低频的测量中,较弱的化学键与…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
51—A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF YOUNG'S MODULUS FOR KERATIN FIBRES
Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信