基数知识与量词理解的关系

IF 1.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Meiling Yang, Yunqi Wang
{"title":"基数知识与量词理解的关系","authors":"Meiling Yang, Yunqi Wang","doi":"10.1080/15475441.2022.2060832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How does linguistic structure affect children’s developing cardinal number knowledge? The bootstrapping theory proposes that children might use syntactic information provided by known words such as quantifiers to bootstrap the meanings of unfamiliar words such as number words. Prior studies of numeral and quantifier development have indicated that the bootstrapping mechanism that children can use to discover numeral meanings might work differently in different languages. Nevertheless, support for this conclusion remains preliminary. The present study explored this hypothesis through an investigation of the possible relations between cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Notably, in contrast with previous studies, this study also offered a glimpse into children’s receptive vocabulary development and its relation with cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension. Results showed that cardinal number knowledge did not seem to be correlated with quantifier comprehension (both “exact” and “non-exact” quantifiers) when controlling for such covariates as children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income. Moreover, children’s receptive vocabulary size explained a significant amount of variance in their quantifier knowledge over and above children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income, but not in their cardinal number development over and above these covariates. These results provide further evidence for the hypothesis that while the bootstrapping mechanism may facilitate number word learning in children speaking languages like English, it might play a lesser role in children speaking classifier languages such as Mandarin Chinese. Implications for the role that general receptive vocabulary plays in the acquisition of number words and quantifiers are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":46642,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relations between Cardinal Number Knowledge and Quantifier Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Meiling Yang, Yunqi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15475441.2022.2060832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT How does linguistic structure affect children’s developing cardinal number knowledge? The bootstrapping theory proposes that children might use syntactic information provided by known words such as quantifiers to bootstrap the meanings of unfamiliar words such as number words. Prior studies of numeral and quantifier development have indicated that the bootstrapping mechanism that children can use to discover numeral meanings might work differently in different languages. Nevertheless, support for this conclusion remains preliminary. The present study explored this hypothesis through an investigation of the possible relations between cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Notably, in contrast with previous studies, this study also offered a glimpse into children’s receptive vocabulary development and its relation with cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension. Results showed that cardinal number knowledge did not seem to be correlated with quantifier comprehension (both “exact” and “non-exact” quantifiers) when controlling for such covariates as children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income. Moreover, children’s receptive vocabulary size explained a significant amount of variance in their quantifier knowledge over and above children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income, but not in their cardinal number development over and above these covariates. These results provide further evidence for the hypothesis that while the bootstrapping mechanism may facilitate number word learning in children speaking languages like English, it might play a lesser role in children speaking classifier languages such as Mandarin Chinese. Implications for the role that general receptive vocabulary plays in the acquisition of number words and quantifiers are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Learning and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Learning and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2022.2060832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2022.2060832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

语言结构如何影响儿童基数知识的发展?自举理论认为,儿童可能会利用量词等已知词汇提供的句法信息来自举数字等不熟悉词汇的含义。先前对数量词发展的研究表明,儿童用来发现数字意义的自我引导机制在不同的语言中可能起着不同的作用。然而,对这一结论的支持仍然是初步的。本研究通过调查汉语普通话儿童基数知识与量词理解之间的可能关系来探讨这一假设。值得注意的是,与以往的研究相比,本研究还揭示了儿童接受性词汇的发展及其与基数知识和量词理解的关系。结果表明,当控制诸如儿童年龄、性别、父母教育程度和家庭收入等协变量时,基数知识似乎与量词理解(包括“精确”和“非精确”量词)无关。此外,儿童的接受性词汇量解释了其量词知识在儿童年龄、性别、父母教育程度和家庭收入之外的显著差异,但在这些协变量之外的基数发展中却没有解释。这些结果为以下假设提供了进一步的证据,即尽管自举机制可能促进说英语等语言的儿童学习数字单词,但它可能在说汉语等分类语言的儿童中发挥较小的作用。本文还讨论了一般接受性词汇在数词和量词习得中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relations between Cardinal Number Knowledge and Quantifier Comprehension
ABSTRACT How does linguistic structure affect children’s developing cardinal number knowledge? The bootstrapping theory proposes that children might use syntactic information provided by known words such as quantifiers to bootstrap the meanings of unfamiliar words such as number words. Prior studies of numeral and quantifier development have indicated that the bootstrapping mechanism that children can use to discover numeral meanings might work differently in different languages. Nevertheless, support for this conclusion remains preliminary. The present study explored this hypothesis through an investigation of the possible relations between cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension in Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Notably, in contrast with previous studies, this study also offered a glimpse into children’s receptive vocabulary development and its relation with cardinal number knowledge and quantifier comprehension. Results showed that cardinal number knowledge did not seem to be correlated with quantifier comprehension (both “exact” and “non-exact” quantifiers) when controlling for such covariates as children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income. Moreover, children’s receptive vocabulary size explained a significant amount of variance in their quantifier knowledge over and above children’s age, gender, parent education, and family income, but not in their cardinal number development over and above these covariates. These results provide further evidence for the hypothesis that while the bootstrapping mechanism may facilitate number word learning in children speaking languages like English, it might play a lesser role in children speaking classifier languages such as Mandarin Chinese. Implications for the role that general receptive vocabulary plays in the acquisition of number words and quantifiers are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信