网页浏览的用户体验——可用性与体验质量的关系

Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, T. Hossfeld, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, R. Schatz, S. Möller
{"title":"网页浏览的用户体验——可用性与体验质量的关系","authors":"Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, T. Hossfeld, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, R. Schatz, S. Möller","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experience of web services depends on multiple factors such as the usability of the service itself as well as influences on Quality of Experience (QoE) like waiting times. Existing studies so far have investigated both experimental factors (usability and QoE) in isolation, thus it is not possible to investigate dependencies between the two. In this study, we manipulated the usability and QoE of a news web page in the same experiment. Participants had to solve 9 tasks (three usability level and three QoE level, all combinations). Data (N=44) from two different sessions with different QoE manipulations were recorded: Simulation of initial page display delay via 1) a complete overlay and 2) a semi-transparent overlay. Our preliminary results show that the usability manipulation resulted in significant effects along multiple dimensions (QoE, aesthetic, and usability). Furthermore, also the implementation of the QoE manipulation had an effect on, e.g., performance parameters. Surprisingly, our results reveal that participants seem to be unable to rate the constructs usability and QoE independently from each other. Even after adding pronounced explanations of the constructs to the introductory phase of the second session of the experiment, the results still show a strong correlation between the two constructs. We thus recommend for similar future experiments to check beforehand whether Quality of Experience and Usability can be reliably judged and distinguished by naive participants.","PeriodicalId":6618,"journal":{"name":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Experience of Web Browsing - The Relationship of Usability and Quality of Experience\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, T. Hossfeld, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, R. Schatz, S. Möller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The experience of web services depends on multiple factors such as the usability of the service itself as well as influences on Quality of Experience (QoE) like waiting times. Existing studies so far have investigated both experimental factors (usability and QoE) in isolation, thus it is not possible to investigate dependencies between the two. In this study, we manipulated the usability and QoE of a news web page in the same experiment. Participants had to solve 9 tasks (three usability level and three QoE level, all combinations). Data (N=44) from two different sessions with different QoE manipulations were recorded: Simulation of initial page display delay via 1) a complete overlay and 2) a semi-transparent overlay. Our preliminary results show that the usability manipulation resulted in significant effects along multiple dimensions (QoE, aesthetic, and usability). Furthermore, also the implementation of the QoE manipulation had an effect on, e.g., performance parameters. Surprisingly, our results reveal that participants seem to be unable to rate the constructs usability and QoE independently from each other. Even after adding pronounced explanations of the constructs to the introductory phase of the second session of the experiment, the results still show a strong correlation between the two constructs. We thus recommend for similar future experiments to check beforehand whether Quality of Experience and Usability can be reliably judged and distinguished by naive participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

web服务的体验取决于多种因素,比如服务本身的可用性,以及对体验质量(QoE)的影响,比如等待时间。到目前为止,现有的研究已经单独调查了这两个实验因素(可用性和QoE),因此不可能调查两者之间的依赖关系。在本研究中,我们在同一实验中操纵了新闻网页的可用性和QoE。参与者必须解决9个任务(3个可用性级别和3个QoE级别,所有组合)。记录了不同QoE操作的两个不同会话的数据(N=44):通过1)完全覆盖和2)半透明覆盖模拟初始页面显示延迟。我们的初步结果表明,可用性操作在多个维度(QoE、美学和可用性)上产生了显著的影响。此外,QoE操作的实现也会对性能参数等产生影响。令人惊讶的是,我们的结果显示,参与者似乎无法独立地评价结构的可用性和QoE。即使在实验第二阶段的入门阶段添加了对构念的明确解释,结果仍然显示这两个构念之间存在很强的相关性。因此,我们建议在未来进行类似的实验,以事先检查经验质量和可用性是否可以被天真的参与者可靠地判断和区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Experience of Web Browsing - The Relationship of Usability and Quality of Experience
The experience of web services depends on multiple factors such as the usability of the service itself as well as influences on Quality of Experience (QoE) like waiting times. Existing studies so far have investigated both experimental factors (usability and QoE) in isolation, thus it is not possible to investigate dependencies between the two. In this study, we manipulated the usability and QoE of a news web page in the same experiment. Participants had to solve 9 tasks (three usability level and three QoE level, all combinations). Data (N=44) from two different sessions with different QoE manipulations were recorded: Simulation of initial page display delay via 1) a complete overlay and 2) a semi-transparent overlay. Our preliminary results show that the usability manipulation resulted in significant effects along multiple dimensions (QoE, aesthetic, and usability). Furthermore, also the implementation of the QoE manipulation had an effect on, e.g., performance parameters. Surprisingly, our results reveal that participants seem to be unable to rate the constructs usability and QoE independently from each other. Even after adding pronounced explanations of the constructs to the introductory phase of the second session of the experiment, the results still show a strong correlation between the two constructs. We thus recommend for similar future experiments to check beforehand whether Quality of Experience and Usability can be reliably judged and distinguished by naive participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信