塑造包容的教师教育:双认证计划制度话语分析

IF 2 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Australian Educational Researcher Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.3102/0013189X231156593

Joyce Gomez-Najarro, M. Pugach, L. Blanton

{"title":"塑造包容的教师教育:双认证计划制度话语分析","authors":"Joyce Gomez-Najarro, M. Pugach, L. Blanton","doi":"10.3102/0013189X231156593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual certification programs are proliferating as the principal means of preparing teachers for inclusive practice. Drawing on the 1,408 university-based teacher education programs on the 2019 Title II database, we examined the institutional website discourse for every program offering prospective teachers the opportunity to earn a general and special education license. One-quarter of these websites reflected discourse conveying inclusion as a reform, transformational, and equity strategy for teaching; three-quarters limited discourse to the practical benefit of earning two licenses, absent any elaboration regarding inclusive teaching. This raises questions regarding whether these programs serve a robust reform function in orienting prospective teachers to inclusive practice or instead a transactional function that maintains the traditional binary relationship between general and special education.","PeriodicalId":47159,"journal":{"name":"Australian Educational Researcher","volume":"234 1","pages":"327 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portraying Teacher Education for Inclusion: An Analysis of the Institutional Discourse of Dual Certification Programs\",\"authors\":\"Joyce Gomez-Najarro, M. Pugach, L. Blanton\",\"doi\":\"10.3102/0013189X231156593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dual certification programs are proliferating as the principal means of preparing teachers for inclusive practice. Drawing on the 1,408 university-based teacher education programs on the 2019 Title II database, we examined the institutional website discourse for every program offering prospective teachers the opportunity to earn a general and special education license. One-quarter of these websites reflected discourse conveying inclusion as a reform, transformational, and equity strategy for teaching; three-quarters limited discourse to the practical benefit of earning two licenses, absent any elaboration regarding inclusive teaching. This raises questions regarding whether these programs serve a robust reform function in orienting prospective teachers to inclusive practice or instead a transactional function that maintains the traditional binary relationship between general and special education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Educational Researcher\",\"volume\":\"234 1\",\"pages\":\"327 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Educational Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231156593\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231156593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

双重认证计划正在激增，成为教师为包容性实践做好准备的主要手段。根据2019年标题II数据库中的1,408个大学教师教育项目，我们检查了每个为未来教师提供获得普通和特殊教育执照机会的项目的机构网站话语。这些网站中有四分之一的话语将包容作为一种改革、转型和公平的教学策略;四分之三的人将论述限制在获得两个执照的实际利益上，没有对包容性教学进行任何阐述。这就提出了一个问题，即这些项目是在引导未来教师进行包容性实践方面起到了强有力的改革作用，还是在维持普通教育和特殊教育之间传统的二元关系方面起到了交易作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Portraying Teacher Education for Inclusion: An Analysis of the Institutional Discourse of Dual Certification Programs

Dual certification programs are proliferating as the principal means of preparing teachers for inclusive practice. Drawing on the 1,408 university-based teacher education programs on the 2019 Title II database, we examined the institutional website discourse for every program offering prospective teachers the opportunity to earn a general and special education license. One-quarter of these websites reflected discourse conveying inclusion as a reform, transformational, and equity strategy for teaching; three-quarters limited discourse to the practical benefit of earning two licenses, absent any elaboration regarding inclusive teaching. This raises questions regarding whether these programs serve a robust reform function in orienting prospective teachers to inclusive practice or instead a transactional function that maintains the traditional binary relationship between general and special education.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australian Educational Researcher is the international, peer reviewed journal published by AARE. The Australian Educational Researcher is published three times a year and is a Thomson (ISI) indexed journal. The aim of AER is to:Promote understandings of educational issues through the publication of original research and scholarly essays.Inform education policy through the publication of papers utilising a range of research methodologies and addressing issues of theory and practice.Provide a research forum for education researchers to debate current problems and issues.Provide an international and national perspective on education research through the publication of book reviews, scholarly essays, original quantitative and qualitative research and papers that are methodologically or theoretically innovative.AER welcomes contributions from a variety of disciplinary perspectives on any level of education.