对话与紧张

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Sweeny
{"title":"对话与紧张","authors":"R. Sweeny","doi":"10.1080/00393541.2022.2096358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O n May 24, 2022, 19 children and two teachers were killed by an 18-yearold gunman in Uvalde, Texas (Bogel-Burroughs et al., 2022). In the aftermath of the second deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, the polarized political responses have become all too familiar. The crisis of gun violence in the United States continues with no signs of slowing, leaving U.S. citizens caught between two firmly held and often diametrically opposed positions; gun rights advocates argue for the unassailable nature of the Second Amendment, while citizens concerned with the loss of innocent lives demand gun-safety measures.","PeriodicalId":45648,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Art Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"183 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogue and Tension\",\"authors\":\"R. Sweeny\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00393541.2022.2096358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O n May 24, 2022, 19 children and two teachers were killed by an 18-yearold gunman in Uvalde, Texas (Bogel-Burroughs et al., 2022). In the aftermath of the second deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, the polarized political responses have become all too familiar. The crisis of gun violence in the United States continues with no signs of slowing, leaving U.S. citizens caught between two firmly held and often diametrically opposed positions; gun rights advocates argue for the unassailable nature of the Second Amendment, while citizens concerned with the loss of innocent lives demand gun-safety measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Art Education\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Art Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2022.2096358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Art Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2022.2096358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2022年5月24日,19名儿童和2名教师在德克萨斯州Uvalde被一名18岁的枪手杀害(Bogel-Burroughs et al., 2022)。在美国历史上第二次最致命的校园枪击事件发生后,两极分化的政治反应已经变得太熟悉了。美国的枪支暴力危机仍在继续,没有任何减缓的迹象,使美国公民陷入两种截然相反的坚定立场之间;拥枪权的倡导者主张宪法第二修正案是无懈可击的,而担心无辜生命损失的公民则要求采取枪支安全措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialogue and Tension
O n May 24, 2022, 19 children and two teachers were killed by an 18-yearold gunman in Uvalde, Texas (Bogel-Burroughs et al., 2022). In the aftermath of the second deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, the polarized political responses have become all too familiar. The crisis of gun violence in the United States continues with no signs of slowing, leaving U.S. citizens caught between two firmly held and often diametrically opposed positions; gun rights advocates argue for the unassailable nature of the Second Amendment, while citizens concerned with the loss of innocent lives demand gun-safety measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Art Education
Studies in Art Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信