公共债务:我对“凯恩斯主义”理论的异议

Edmund Phelps
{"title":"公共债务:我对“凯恩斯主义”理论的异议","authors":"Edmund Phelps","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2022.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When a governmental crisis subsides, citizens are apt to wonder whether all the deficit spending is going to cost something. This situation is the subject of wildly differing views. Which view appears to be most nearly right? The Keynesian view that public debt serves to pull up employment, thus reducing the unemployment rate and inducing higher participation? Or the neoclassical view that public debt sets the capital stock onto a lower path, thus decreasing the labor force and employment?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000015/pdfft?md5=ac6433b51ca793fc39eeb51fa8b19a91&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319322000015-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Debt: My Dissent from “Keynesian” Theories\",\"authors\":\"Edmund Phelps\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jge.2022.100029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When a governmental crisis subsides, citizens are apt to wonder whether all the deficit spending is going to cost something. This situation is the subject of wildly differing views. Which view appears to be most nearly right? The Keynesian view that public debt serves to pull up employment, thus reducing the unemployment rate and inducing higher participation? Or the neoclassical view that public debt sets the capital stock onto a lower path, thus decreasing the labor force and employment?</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000015/pdfft?md5=ac6433b51ca793fc39eeb51fa8b19a91&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319322000015-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319322000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

当一场政府危机消退时,公民们往往会怀疑,所有的赤字支出是否都要付出代价。对这种情况的看法大相径庭。哪一种观点更接近正确?凯恩斯的观点认为公共债务有助于拉动就业,从而降低失业率并提高参与率?还是新古典主义的观点,即公共债务使资本存量下降,从而减少劳动力和就业?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Debt: My Dissent from “Keynesian” Theories

When a governmental crisis subsides, citizens are apt to wonder whether all the deficit spending is going to cost something. This situation is the subject of wildly differing views. Which view appears to be most nearly right? The Keynesian view that public debt serves to pull up employment, thus reducing the unemployment rate and inducing higher participation? Or the neoclassical view that public debt sets the capital stock onto a lower path, thus decreasing the labor force and employment?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信