QuEChERS和GC-MS/MS联用分析中草药中农药

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
G. Seo, A. Kim, Byoungsik Pyo, K. Lee
{"title":"QuEChERS和GC-MS/MS联用分析中草药中农药","authors":"G. Seo, A. Kim, Byoungsik Pyo, K. Lee","doi":"10.22889/KJP.2020.51.3.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The analysis method for qualitative analysis of the screening method that can be performed prior to the quantitative analysis of individual pesticide was reviewed in order to meet the safety standards that are being strengthened in the field of pesticide residue testing of herbal medicines. Among the residual pesticides presented in the Korean Pharmacopoeia, 56 pesticides, excluding 15 pesticides that need to be individually analyzed, were selected for analysis using QuEChERS preprocessing and GC-MS/MS, which are used in the existing agricultural products field. For each pesticide, the detection limit level of 0.001-0.005 mg/kg and the quantitative limit level of 0.002-0.017 mg/kg were confirmed. In the recovery test in which the standard was treated at a concentration of 0.02 mg/kg, it was confirmed that the proportion of pesticides satisfying the recovery of 70-120% was 85.7-96.4% for each herbal medicine, so it was confirmed that it was a level that could be reviewed by the screening method.","PeriodicalId":17851,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy","volume":"20 1","pages":"207-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Pesticides in Herbal Medicine by QuEChERS and GC-MS/MS\",\"authors\":\"G. Seo, A. Kim, Byoungsik Pyo, K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.22889/KJP.2020.51.3.207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" The analysis method for qualitative analysis of the screening method that can be performed prior to the quantitative analysis of individual pesticide was reviewed in order to meet the safety standards that are being strengthened in the field of pesticide residue testing of herbal medicines. Among the residual pesticides presented in the Korean Pharmacopoeia, 56 pesticides, excluding 15 pesticides that need to be individually analyzed, were selected for analysis using QuEChERS preprocessing and GC-MS/MS, which are used in the existing agricultural products field. For each pesticide, the detection limit level of 0.001-0.005 mg/kg and the quantitative limit level of 0.002-0.017 mg/kg were confirmed. In the recovery test in which the standard was treated at a concentration of 0.02 mg/kg, it was confirmed that the proportion of pesticides satisfying the recovery of 70-120% was 85.7-96.4% for each herbal medicine, so it was confirmed that it was a level that could be reviewed by the screening method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"207-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22889/KJP.2020.51.3.207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22889/KJP.2020.51.3.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了满足草药农药残留检测领域正在加强的安全标准,对可在单个农药定量分析之前进行的筛选方法进行定性分析的分析方法进行了审查。在韩国药典中收录的残留农药中,除15种需要单独分析的农药外,选择56种农药,采用现有农产品领域常用的QuEChERS预处理和GC-MS/MS进行分析。每种农药的检出限为0.001 ~ 0.005 mg/kg,定量限为0.002 ~ 0.017 mg/kg。在标准品浓度为0.02 mg/kg处理的回收率试验中,确认每种药材的农药回收率达到70 ~ 120%的比例为85.7 ~ 96.4%,确认为可通过筛选方法进行评审的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Pesticides in Herbal Medicine by QuEChERS and GC-MS/MS
 The analysis method for qualitative analysis of the screening method that can be performed prior to the quantitative analysis of individual pesticide was reviewed in order to meet the safety standards that are being strengthened in the field of pesticide residue testing of herbal medicines. Among the residual pesticides presented in the Korean Pharmacopoeia, 56 pesticides, excluding 15 pesticides that need to be individually analyzed, were selected for analysis using QuEChERS preprocessing and GC-MS/MS, which are used in the existing agricultural products field. For each pesticide, the detection limit level of 0.001-0.005 mg/kg and the quantitative limit level of 0.002-0.017 mg/kg were confirmed. In the recovery test in which the standard was treated at a concentration of 0.02 mg/kg, it was confirmed that the proportion of pesticides satisfying the recovery of 70-120% was 85.7-96.4% for each herbal medicine, so it was confirmed that it was a level that could be reviewed by the screening method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy
Korean Journal of Pharmacognosy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信