第二意见在多大程度上改善了男性的健康?

IF 0.4 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
C. Woodhouse
{"title":"第二意见在多大程度上改善了男性的健康?","authors":"C. Woodhouse","doi":"10.1002/tre.874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value of second opinions in medicine is debatable. There are few data on the topic, but it seems that in most cases there is no benefit in terms of outcomes, with some notable exceptions. Improving communication may be a more fruitful area to explore, as most requests for a second opinion appear to result from poor doctor/patient communication.","PeriodicalId":42819,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Urology & Mens Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much do second opinions improve men's health?\",\"authors\":\"C. Woodhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tre.874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The value of second opinions in medicine is debatable. There are few data on the topic, but it seems that in most cases there is no benefit in terms of outcomes, with some notable exceptions. Improving communication may be a more fruitful area to explore, as most requests for a second opinion appear to result from poor doctor/patient communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Urology & Mens Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Urology & Mens Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tre.874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Urology & Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tre.874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学上第二意见的价值是有争议的。关于这个话题的数据很少,但似乎在大多数情况下,就结果而言,它没有任何好处,除了一些明显的例外。改善沟通可能是一个更有成效的探索领域,因为大多数要求第二意见的请求似乎是由于医患沟通不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How much do second opinions improve men's health?
The value of second opinions in medicine is debatable. There are few data on the topic, but it seems that in most cases there is no benefit in terms of outcomes, with some notable exceptions. Improving communication may be a more fruitful area to explore, as most requests for a second opinion appear to result from poor doctor/patient communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Urology & Mens Health
Trends in Urology & Mens Health UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信