概率论与黑人奴隶制

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Humanidades Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.25185/8.2
R. Pich
{"title":"概率论与黑人奴隶制","authors":"R. Pich","doi":"10.25185/8.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known yet about the normative discussions on black slavery that were had by scholastic thinkers from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In this article, we connect the writings of Diego de Avendano S.J. (1594–1688) to the conceptual history of the slavery of black people. We highlight in particular the connection that Avendano promotes between the legitimacy of the slave trade, slave ownership and probabilism. This new perspective is acknowledged and criticized by Francisco Jose de Jaca O.F.M. Cap. (c. 1645–1689) and Epifanio de Moirans O.F.M. Cap. (1644–1689). The main purpose of the present essay is to describe and interpret the reactions of these two authors to Avendano’s discussion. Their anti-slavery works provide views on slavery in the ius gentium, freedom as a good and a right, and the insufficiency of moral probabilism as a doctrine when applied to the problem of the slavery of Africans.","PeriodicalId":52962,"journal":{"name":"Humanidades","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilismo y esclavitud negra\",\"authors\":\"R. Pich\",\"doi\":\"10.25185/8.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little is known yet about the normative discussions on black slavery that were had by scholastic thinkers from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In this article, we connect the writings of Diego de Avendano S.J. (1594–1688) to the conceptual history of the slavery of black people. We highlight in particular the connection that Avendano promotes between the legitimacy of the slave trade, slave ownership and probabilism. This new perspective is acknowledged and criticized by Francisco Jose de Jaca O.F.M. Cap. (c. 1645–1689) and Epifanio de Moirans O.F.M. Cap. (1644–1689). The main purpose of the present essay is to describe and interpret the reactions of these two authors to Avendano’s discussion. Their anti-slavery works provide views on slavery in the ius gentium, freedom as a good and a right, and the insufficiency of moral probabilism as a doctrine when applied to the problem of the slavery of Africans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanidades\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanidades\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25185/8.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25185/8.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从16世纪到18世纪,学者们对黑人奴隶制的规范性讨论知之甚少。在这篇文章中,我们将Diego de Avendano S.J.(1594-1688)的作品与黑人奴隶制的概念历史联系起来。我们特别强调了阿文达诺提出的奴隶贸易的合法性、奴隶所有权和可能性之间的联系。弗朗西斯科·何塞·德·雅卡(约1645-1689年)和埃皮法尼奥·德·莫伊兰斯(1644-1689年)承认并批评了这种新的观点。本文的主要目的是描述和解释这两位作者对Avendano的讨论的反应。他们的反奴隶制著作提供了对ius gentium中的奴隶制,自由作为一种善和权利的观点,以及道德概率论作为一种理论在应用于非洲奴隶问题时的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilismo y esclavitud negra
Little is known yet about the normative discussions on black slavery that were had by scholastic thinkers from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. In this article, we connect the writings of Diego de Avendano S.J. (1594–1688) to the conceptual history of the slavery of black people. We highlight in particular the connection that Avendano promotes between the legitimacy of the slave trade, slave ownership and probabilism. This new perspective is acknowledged and criticized by Francisco Jose de Jaca O.F.M. Cap. (c. 1645–1689) and Epifanio de Moirans O.F.M. Cap. (1644–1689). The main purpose of the present essay is to describe and interpret the reactions of these two authors to Avendano’s discussion. Their anti-slavery works provide views on slavery in the ius gentium, freedom as a good and a right, and the insufficiency of moral probabilism as a doctrine when applied to the problem of the slavery of Africans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信