21世纪科学教育:批判-创造的社会建构主义视角

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Bentley, Stephen C. Fleury
{"title":"21世纪科学教育:批判-创造的社会建构主义视角","authors":"M. Bentley, Stephen C. Fleury","doi":"10.14288/CE.V8I11.186192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dominant narrative of curriculum and educational reforms prevailing in many countries is identified, described, and critiqued and an analysis advanced from the philosophical anthropology of education. A constructivist theoretical perspective is both critical and creative in offering (a) insight into the implicit and explicit dangers of the privileged form of knowledge in education, and (b) alternatives that reduce threats of ecocide and promote socially just and sustainable democracies. Examined in the context of official curriculum, the commodification of knowledge via testing and standards, and students’ epistemological development are the social and political consequences of the (1) reification, (2) de-contextualization, and (3) technocratization of school knowledge. A significant mismatch is found between current education and the state of the world, beset with environmental degradation, rapid technological change, and global economy. The educative task now is how to educate students for democratic citizenship in a new social-ecological era, requiring student-centered school cultures that apply the principle of epistemological symmetry in terms of respecting local knowledges and revealing science as a human endeavor.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"21st Century Science Education: A Critical-Creative Social Constructivist Perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Bentley, Stephen C. Fleury\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CE.V8I11.186192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dominant narrative of curriculum and educational reforms prevailing in many countries is identified, described, and critiqued and an analysis advanced from the philosophical anthropology of education. A constructivist theoretical perspective is both critical and creative in offering (a) insight into the implicit and explicit dangers of the privileged form of knowledge in education, and (b) alternatives that reduce threats of ecocide and promote socially just and sustainable democracies. Examined in the context of official curriculum, the commodification of knowledge via testing and standards, and students’ epistemological development are the social and political consequences of the (1) reification, (2) de-contextualization, and (3) technocratization of school knowledge. A significant mismatch is found between current education and the state of the world, beset with environmental degradation, rapid technological change, and global economy. The educative task now is how to educate students for democratic citizenship in a new social-ecological era, requiring student-centered school cultures that apply the principle of epistemological symmetry in terms of respecting local knowledges and revealing science as a human endeavor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V8I11.186192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V8I11.186192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在许多国家盛行的课程和教育改革的主导叙事被识别、描述和批评,并从教育的哲学人类学提出了分析。建构主义的理论视角在提供(A)对教育中特权知识形式的隐性和显性危险的洞察,以及(b)减少生态灭绝威胁和促进社会公正和可持续民主的替代方案方面具有批判性和创造性。在官方课程的背景下,通过考试和标准实现的知识商品化,以及学生的认识论发展,是学校知识(1)物化、(2)去语境化和(3)技术化的社会和政治后果。当前的教育与环境恶化、快速的技术变革和全球经济所困扰的世界状况之间存在着明显的不匹配。当前的教育任务是如何在新的社会生态时代教育学生民主公民,这需要以学生为中心的学校文化,在尊重地方知识和揭示科学作为人类努力方面应用认识论对称原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
21st Century Science Education: A Critical-Creative Social Constructivist Perspective
The dominant narrative of curriculum and educational reforms prevailing in many countries is identified, described, and critiqued and an analysis advanced from the philosophical anthropology of education. A constructivist theoretical perspective is both critical and creative in offering (a) insight into the implicit and explicit dangers of the privileged form of knowledge in education, and (b) alternatives that reduce threats of ecocide and promote socially just and sustainable democracies. Examined in the context of official curriculum, the commodification of knowledge via testing and standards, and students’ epistemological development are the social and political consequences of the (1) reification, (2) de-contextualization, and (3) technocratization of school knowledge. A significant mismatch is found between current education and the state of the world, beset with environmental degradation, rapid technological change, and global economy. The educative task now is how to educate students for democratic citizenship in a new social-ecological era, requiring student-centered school cultures that apply the principle of epistemological symmetry in terms of respecting local knowledges and revealing science as a human endeavor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信