橙圈文学旅与20世纪30年代末车里雅宾斯克的文学运动

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
N. Zhuravleva
{"title":"橙圈文学旅与20世纪30年代末车里雅宾斯克的文学运动","authors":"N. Zhuravleva","doi":"10.15826/izv2.2023.25.1.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the short period of existence of the Orange Circle literary brigade in Chelyabinsk (1939–1940). Sharing the belief in building communism, the team developed outside the Union of Soviet Writers and relied on the aesthetics of the Silver Age in their work. This was probably due to the influence of its leader Alexey Bykov, a writer who began his career in St Petersburg in the early twentieth century and published the novel Thistle (1907). Unfortunately, the lack of publications and the loss of manuscripts, as well as the scarce number of archival materials make it difficult to reconstruct the social and literary practices of the group. However, the very fact of the appearance of such an “alternative” association in the era of early Stalinism in a provincial town with a meager sociocultural base which received an impulse for development only during the first five-year plans gives rise to scholarly reflection. The birth of the literary brigade took place during a difficult period in the history of the USSR, which had embarked on an unprecedented path of building socialism. The inconsistency of the process of institutionalisation of the new system gave rise to previously unfamiliar conflicts at all levels, which were especially acute in the artistic environment. The author demonstrates that over many years, the Chelyabinsk branch of the Union of Soviet Writers was able to organise full-fledged work. This was due to the frequent change of leadership, including due to the repression of many members, the reorganisation of the management system of the Union’s branches, the predominance of non-professional authors, the shortage of “old” personnel, including editors, the lack of interaction between writers and regional authorities, the scarcity of the pre-revolutionary literary tradition, the poverty of prose writers and poets, especially beginners who often used this artistic structure for selfish purposes.","PeriodicalId":42281,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Orange Circle Literary Brigade and the Literary Movement of Chelyabinsk in the Late 1930s\",\"authors\":\"N. Zhuravleva\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/izv2.2023.25.1.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the short period of existence of the Orange Circle literary brigade in Chelyabinsk (1939–1940). Sharing the belief in building communism, the team developed outside the Union of Soviet Writers and relied on the aesthetics of the Silver Age in their work. This was probably due to the influence of its leader Alexey Bykov, a writer who began his career in St Petersburg in the early twentieth century and published the novel Thistle (1907). Unfortunately, the lack of publications and the loss of manuscripts, as well as the scarce number of archival materials make it difficult to reconstruct the social and literary practices of the group. However, the very fact of the appearance of such an “alternative” association in the era of early Stalinism in a provincial town with a meager sociocultural base which received an impulse for development only during the first five-year plans gives rise to scholarly reflection. The birth of the literary brigade took place during a difficult period in the history of the USSR, which had embarked on an unprecedented path of building socialism. The inconsistency of the process of institutionalisation of the new system gave rise to previously unfamiliar conflicts at all levels, which were especially acute in the artistic environment. The author demonstrates that over many years, the Chelyabinsk branch of the Union of Soviet Writers was able to organise full-fledged work. This was due to the frequent change of leadership, including due to the repression of many members, the reorganisation of the management system of the Union’s branches, the predominance of non-professional authors, the shortage of “old” personnel, including editors, the lack of interaction between writers and regional authorities, the scarcity of the pre-revolutionary literary tradition, the poverty of prose writers and poets, especially beginners who often used this artistic structure for selfish purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2023.25.1.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2023.25.1.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了车里雅宾斯克“橙色圈”文学旅在车里雅宾斯克存在的短暂时期(1939-1940)。为了分享建立共产主义的信念,这个团队在苏联作家联盟之外发展,并在他们的作品中依赖于白银时代的美学。这可能是由于其领导人阿列克谢·别科夫(Alexey Bykov)的影响,他是一位作家,20世纪初在圣彼得堡开始他的职业生涯,并出版了小说《蓟》(1907)。不幸的是,由于出版物的缺乏和手稿的丢失,以及档案材料的稀少,很难重建该群体的社会和文学实践。然而,在斯大林主义的早期时代,在一个社会文化基础薄弱、仅在第一个五年计划期间才获得发展动力的外省城镇,出现这样一个“另类”协会,这一事实本身就引起了学术界的反思。文艺大队诞生于苏联历史上的困难时期,苏联走上了一条前所未有的建设社会主义的道路。新体制制度化过程的不一致性,在各个层面引发了以前不熟悉的冲突,在艺术环境中尤为尖锐。作者证明,多年来,苏联作家联盟车里雅宾斯克分部能够组织成熟的工作。这是由于领导层的频繁更替,包括对许多成员的镇压,工会分支机构管理制度的重组,非专业作家占主导地位,包括编辑在内的“老”人员短缺,作家和地区当局之间缺乏互动,革命前的文学传统缺乏,散文作家和诗人的贫困,尤其是初学者,他们经常利用这种艺术结构来达到自私的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Orange Circle Literary Brigade and the Literary Movement of Chelyabinsk in the Late 1930s
This article considers the short period of existence of the Orange Circle literary brigade in Chelyabinsk (1939–1940). Sharing the belief in building communism, the team developed outside the Union of Soviet Writers and relied on the aesthetics of the Silver Age in their work. This was probably due to the influence of its leader Alexey Bykov, a writer who began his career in St Petersburg in the early twentieth century and published the novel Thistle (1907). Unfortunately, the lack of publications and the loss of manuscripts, as well as the scarce number of archival materials make it difficult to reconstruct the social and literary practices of the group. However, the very fact of the appearance of such an “alternative” association in the era of early Stalinism in a provincial town with a meager sociocultural base which received an impulse for development only during the first five-year plans gives rise to scholarly reflection. The birth of the literary brigade took place during a difficult period in the history of the USSR, which had embarked on an unprecedented path of building socialism. The inconsistency of the process of institutionalisation of the new system gave rise to previously unfamiliar conflicts at all levels, which were especially acute in the artistic environment. The author demonstrates that over many years, the Chelyabinsk branch of the Union of Soviet Writers was able to organise full-fledged work. This was due to the frequent change of leadership, including due to the repression of many members, the reorganisation of the management system of the Union’s branches, the predominance of non-professional authors, the shortage of “old” personnel, including editors, the lack of interaction between writers and regional authorities, the scarcity of the pre-revolutionary literary tradition, the poverty of prose writers and poets, especially beginners who often used this artistic structure for selfish purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信