分类模型研究的文献趋势:文献计量学方法

Q2 Social Sciences
An International, Hashibah Hamid, Aidi Ahmi, F. Okwonu, W. A. Mustafa
{"title":"分类模型研究的文献趋势:文献计量学方法","authors":"An International, Hashibah Hamid, Aidi Ahmi, F. Okwonu, W. A. Mustafa","doi":"10.18576/isl/120820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper analyses and reports various types of published works related to classification or discriminant modelling. This paper adopted a bibliometric analysis based on the data obtained from the Scopus online database on 27th July 2019. Based on the ‘keywords’ search results, it yielded 2775 valid documents for further analysis. For data visualisation purposes, we employed VOSviewer. This paper reports the results using standard bibliometric indicators, particularly on the growth rate of publications, research productivity, analysis of the authors and citations. The outcomes revealed that there is an increased growth rate of classification literature over the years since 1968. A total of 2473 (89.12%) documents were from journals ( n =1439; 51.86%) and conference proceedings ( n =1034; 37.26%) contributed as the top publications in this classification topic. Meanwhile, 2578 (92.9%) documents are multi-authored with an average collaboration index of 3.34 authors per article. However, this classification research field found that the famous numbers of authors’ collaboration in a document are two (with n =758; 27.32%), three ( n =752; 27.10%) and four ( n =560; 20.18%) respectively. An analysis by country, China with 1146 (41.30%) published documents thus is ranked first in productivity. With respect to the frequency of citations, Bauer and Kohavi (1999)’s article emerged as the most cited article through 1414 total citations with an average of 70.7 citations per year. Overall, the increasing number of works on classification topics indicates a growing awareness of its importance and specific requirements in this research field.","PeriodicalId":36540,"journal":{"name":"Information Sciences Letters","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Trend of Literature on Classification Modelling: A Bibliometric Approach\",\"authors\":\"An International, Hashibah Hamid, Aidi Ahmi, F. Okwonu, W. A. Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.18576/isl/120820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper analyses and reports various types of published works related to classification or discriminant modelling. This paper adopted a bibliometric analysis based on the data obtained from the Scopus online database on 27th July 2019. Based on the ‘keywords’ search results, it yielded 2775 valid documents for further analysis. For data visualisation purposes, we employed VOSviewer. This paper reports the results using standard bibliometric indicators, particularly on the growth rate of publications, research productivity, analysis of the authors and citations. The outcomes revealed that there is an increased growth rate of classification literature over the years since 1968. A total of 2473 (89.12%) documents were from journals ( n =1439; 51.86%) and conference proceedings ( n =1034; 37.26%) contributed as the top publications in this classification topic. Meanwhile, 2578 (92.9%) documents are multi-authored with an average collaboration index of 3.34 authors per article. However, this classification research field found that the famous numbers of authors’ collaboration in a document are two (with n =758; 27.32%), three ( n =752; 27.10%) and four ( n =560; 20.18%) respectively. An analysis by country, China with 1146 (41.30%) published documents thus is ranked first in productivity. With respect to the frequency of citations, Bauer and Kohavi (1999)’s article emerged as the most cited article through 1414 total citations with an average of 70.7 citations per year. Overall, the increasing number of works on classification topics indicates a growing awareness of its importance and specific requirements in this research field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Sciences Letters\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Sciences Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Sciences Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:本文分析和报道了与分类或判别建模相关的各类已发表作品。本文采用文献计量学分析方法,数据来源于2019年7月27日Scopus在线数据库。根据“keywords”搜索结果,它产生了2775份有效文件,以供进一步分析。出于数据可视化的目的,我们使用了VOSviewer。本文采用标准的文献计量学指标,特别是在出版物增长率、研究生产力、作者分析和引文等方面进行了报告。结果表明,自1968年以来,分类文献的增长率呈上升趋势。共2473篇(89.12%)文献来自期刊(n =1439;51.86%)和会议论文集(n =1034;37.26%)作为该分类主题的顶级出版物。同时,多作者文献2578篇(92.9%),平均协作指数为3.34作者/篇。然而,该分类研究领域发现,一篇文献中作者合作的著名数字是两个(n =758;27.32%), 3例(n =752;27.10%)和4 (n =560;分别为20.18%)。按国家进行分析,中国发表了1146篇(41.30%)论文,因此在生产率方面排名第一。在被引频次方面,Bauer和Kohavi(1999)的文章以1414次总被引次数成为被引频次最多的文章,平均每年被引70.7次。总的来说,越来越多的关于分类主题的工作表明人们越来越认识到分类主题的重要性和对分类主题研究的具体要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Trend of Literature on Classification Modelling: A Bibliometric Approach
: This paper analyses and reports various types of published works related to classification or discriminant modelling. This paper adopted a bibliometric analysis based on the data obtained from the Scopus online database on 27th July 2019. Based on the ‘keywords’ search results, it yielded 2775 valid documents for further analysis. For data visualisation purposes, we employed VOSviewer. This paper reports the results using standard bibliometric indicators, particularly on the growth rate of publications, research productivity, analysis of the authors and citations. The outcomes revealed that there is an increased growth rate of classification literature over the years since 1968. A total of 2473 (89.12%) documents were from journals ( n =1439; 51.86%) and conference proceedings ( n =1034; 37.26%) contributed as the top publications in this classification topic. Meanwhile, 2578 (92.9%) documents are multi-authored with an average collaboration index of 3.34 authors per article. However, this classification research field found that the famous numbers of authors’ collaboration in a document are two (with n =758; 27.32%), three ( n =752; 27.10%) and four ( n =560; 20.18%) respectively. An analysis by country, China with 1146 (41.30%) published documents thus is ranked first in productivity. With respect to the frequency of citations, Bauer and Kohavi (1999)’s article emerged as the most cited article through 1414 total citations with an average of 70.7 citations per year. Overall, the increasing number of works on classification topics indicates a growing awareness of its importance and specific requirements in this research field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Sciences Letters
Information Sciences Letters Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信