使用不同的计算机辅助成像技术比较评价纳米陶瓷复合修复体的边缘适合度:一项体外研究

Zaynab Salem, M. Shakal, R. El-Dessouky
{"title":"使用不同的计算机辅助成像技术比较评价纳米陶瓷复合修复体的边缘适合度:一项体外研究","authors":"Zaynab Salem, M. Shakal, R. El-Dessouky","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_48_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fitness of vonlay nanoceramic hybrid restorations using different computer-aided imaging technique (an in-vitro study). Materials and methods Thirty 3D printed models of prepared premolar (no. 14) for vonlay restoration were fabricated using epoxy resin material and used for fabrication of thirty nanohybrid ceramic vonlays (Grandio Disc, VOCO). three groups (n = 10) of vonlays were fabricated using three different imaging technique: group 1: imaging of conventional impression of master die, group 2: imaging of stone master die and group 3: imaging of master die using chairside TRIOS Intraoral Scanners (3Shape). Vonlays were designed by using a CAD design software program (Exocad Dental CAD, Exocad. The vonlays were cemented over their corresponding dies with an automix dual cure adhesive cement system (Duo-Link universal resin cement, Bisco Inc.) under a static load by using custom made seating device. Digital microscope was used to measure the vertical marginal gap for each where a total of 120 measurements for the three groups (12 sites per vonlay and 10 vonlays per group) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance test was used to analyze the results, Student sample t test was used to examine the marginal gap differences of each group and in the same group. Results A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the marginal gap values of the vonlay restoration fabricated by using different imaging technique. The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners as compared with imaging of master die impression and stone master die. But there was no significant difference between the marginal gap measurements of different sides in the same group. Conclusion The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"145 1","pages":"20 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the marginal fitness of vonlay nanoceramic hybrid restorations using different computer-aided imaging techniques: an in-vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Zaynab Salem, M. Shakal, R. El-Dessouky\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tdj.tdj_48_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fitness of vonlay nanoceramic hybrid restorations using different computer-aided imaging technique (an in-vitro study). Materials and methods Thirty 3D printed models of prepared premolar (no. 14) for vonlay restoration were fabricated using epoxy resin material and used for fabrication of thirty nanohybrid ceramic vonlays (Grandio Disc, VOCO). three groups (n = 10) of vonlays were fabricated using three different imaging technique: group 1: imaging of conventional impression of master die, group 2: imaging of stone master die and group 3: imaging of master die using chairside TRIOS Intraoral Scanners (3Shape). Vonlays were designed by using a CAD design software program (Exocad Dental CAD, Exocad. The vonlays were cemented over their corresponding dies with an automix dual cure adhesive cement system (Duo-Link universal resin cement, Bisco Inc.) under a static load by using custom made seating device. Digital microscope was used to measure the vertical marginal gap for each where a total of 120 measurements for the three groups (12 sites per vonlay and 10 vonlays per group) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance test was used to analyze the results, Student sample t test was used to examine the marginal gap differences of each group and in the same group. Results A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the marginal gap values of the vonlay restoration fabricated by using different imaging technique. The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners as compared with imaging of master die impression and stone master die. But there was no significant difference between the marginal gap measurements of different sides in the same group. Conclusion The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_48_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_48_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本体外研究的目的是利用不同的计算机辅助成像技术(一项体外研究)来评估vonlay纳米陶瓷混合修复体的边际适应度。材料与方法制备的前磨牙3D打印模型30个。用环氧树脂材料制备了30个纳米杂化陶瓷vonlay (Grandio Disc, VOCO)。采用三种不同的成像技术制作三组(n = 10)图像:第1组:常规母模成像,第2组:石材母模成像,第3组:使用chairside TRIOS口内扫描仪(3Shape)对母模成像。使用CAD设计软件(Exocad Dental CAD, Exocad)设计牙排。使用定制的坐垫装置,在静态载荷下,使用自动双固化胶粘接水泥系统(Duo-Link通用树脂水泥,Bisco Inc.)将凹槽粘合在相应的模具上。使用数码显微镜测量每组的垂直边缘间隙,对三组(每组12个位点,每组10个位点)共进行120次测量。采用单因素方差检验分析结果,采用学生样本t检验检验各组间及同一组内的边际差距差异。结果不同成像技术制备的牙槽状修复体边缘间隙值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。与母模印模和石母模的成像相比,使用椅边口内扫描仪制作的vonlay获得了最小的边缘间隙。但同一组不同侧面的边缘间隙测量值无显著差异。结论采用椅边式口腔内扫描器制作的vonlay可获得最小的边缘间隙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of the marginal fitness of vonlay nanoceramic hybrid restorations using different computer-aided imaging techniques: an in-vitro study
Purpose The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fitness of vonlay nanoceramic hybrid restorations using different computer-aided imaging technique (an in-vitro study). Materials and methods Thirty 3D printed models of prepared premolar (no. 14) for vonlay restoration were fabricated using epoxy resin material and used for fabrication of thirty nanohybrid ceramic vonlays (Grandio Disc, VOCO). three groups (n = 10) of vonlays were fabricated using three different imaging technique: group 1: imaging of conventional impression of master die, group 2: imaging of stone master die and group 3: imaging of master die using chairside TRIOS Intraoral Scanners (3Shape). Vonlays were designed by using a CAD design software program (Exocad Dental CAD, Exocad. The vonlays were cemented over their corresponding dies with an automix dual cure adhesive cement system (Duo-Link universal resin cement, Bisco Inc.) under a static load by using custom made seating device. Digital microscope was used to measure the vertical marginal gap for each where a total of 120 measurements for the three groups (12 sites per vonlay and 10 vonlays per group) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance test was used to analyze the results, Student sample t test was used to examine the marginal gap differences of each group and in the same group. Results A significant difference (P < 0.001) was found between the marginal gap values of the vonlay restoration fabricated by using different imaging technique. The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners as compared with imaging of master die impression and stone master die. But there was no significant difference between the marginal gap measurements of different sides in the same group. Conclusion The smallest marginal gaps were obtained with vonlay fabricated using chairside intraoral scanners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信