第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织,第六十条

Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène
{"title":"第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织,第六十条","authors":"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews Article 60 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 60 of the ACHR addresses the crucial issue of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure (RoPs) of the Inter-American Court. For international courts and tribunals, probably more so than for domestic organs, the Statute and RoPs are “constitutive” instruments in the first sense of the term. They set the constitutional framework to be respected by the parties and the judge. Therefore, the question of the drafters of these rules is itself fundamental. The answer to this question gives an idea of the greater or lesser degree of autonomy that the States which created the judicial body intended to provide it with.","PeriodicalId":22363,"journal":{"name":"The American Convention on Human Rights","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 60\",\"authors\":\"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews Article 60 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 60 of the ACHR addresses the crucial issue of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure (RoPs) of the Inter-American Court. For international courts and tribunals, probably more so than for domestic organs, the Statute and RoPs are “constitutive” instruments in the first sense of the term. They set the constitutional framework to be respected by the parties and the judge. Therefore, the question of the drafters of these rules is itself fundamental. The answer to this question gives an idea of the greater or lesser degree of autonomy that the States which created the judicial body intended to provide it with.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Convention on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Convention on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Convention on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章审查《美洲人权公约》第60条。《美洲人权公约》第60条涉及美洲法院《规约》和《议事规则》的关键问题。对于国际法院和法庭来说,规约和章程可能比国内机关更具有“构成性”文书的第一意义。他们制定了宪法框架,以得到各方和法官的尊重。因此,这些规则的起草者问题本身就是一个根本问题。对这个问题的回答可以说明,设立司法机构的国家打算给予司法机构多少程度的自治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 60
This chapter reviews Article 60 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 60 of the ACHR addresses the crucial issue of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure (RoPs) of the Inter-American Court. For international courts and tribunals, probably more so than for domestic organs, the Statute and RoPs are “constitutive” instruments in the first sense of the term. They set the constitutional framework to be respected by the parties and the judge. Therefore, the question of the drafters of these rules is itself fundamental. The answer to this question gives an idea of the greater or lesser degree of autonomy that the States which created the judicial body intended to provide it with.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信