2018年州宪法下的个人权利:哪些权利深深植根于现代各州共识?

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
S. Calabresi, James Lindgren, Hannah M. Begley, Kathryn L. Dore, Sarah E. Agudo
{"title":"2018年州宪法下的个人权利:哪些权利深深植根于现代各州共识?","authors":"S. Calabresi, James Lindgren, Hannah M. Begley, Kathryn L. Dore, Sarah E. Agudo","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3120522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This law review article describes what individual rights are protected under state constitutional law today in 2018; in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified; and in 1791, when the federal Bill of Rights was ratified. We seek to offer a picture over time as to what rights have gone into style and what rights have fallen out of style over the last 227 years. State constitutions are much easier to amend than is the federal constitution, so they provide a good sociological vantage point from which to assess rights. Moreover, since most originalists think that rights should be deeply rooted in history and tradition, as the U.S. Supreme Court held in Washington v. Glucksberg, the 1791 and 1868 data ought to be of interest to them. In contrast, the 2018 data should be of interest to advocates of a living constitution.","PeriodicalId":47176,"journal":{"name":"Notre Dame Law Review","volume":"94 1","pages":"49-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Rights under State Constitutions in 2018: What Rights Are Deeply Rooted in a Modern-Day Consensus of the States?\",\"authors\":\"S. Calabresi, James Lindgren, Hannah M. Begley, Kathryn L. Dore, Sarah E. Agudo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3120522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This law review article describes what individual rights are protected under state constitutional law today in 2018; in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified; and in 1791, when the federal Bill of Rights was ratified. We seek to offer a picture over time as to what rights have gone into style and what rights have fallen out of style over the last 227 years. State constitutions are much easier to amend than is the federal constitution, so they provide a good sociological vantage point from which to assess rights. Moreover, since most originalists think that rights should be deeply rooted in history and tradition, as the U.S. Supreme Court held in Washington v. Glucksberg, the 1791 and 1868 data ought to be of interest to them. In contrast, the 2018 data should be of interest to advocates of a living constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notre Dame Law Review\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"49-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notre Dame Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3120522\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notre Dame Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3120522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇法律评论文章描述了2018年今天受州宪法保护的个人权利;1868年,第十四修正案获得批准;1791年,联邦人权法案获得批准。我们试图提供一幅随时间推移的图景,在过去的227年里,哪些权利已经流行,哪些权利已经过时。州宪法比联邦宪法更容易修改,因此它们为评估权利提供了一个很好的社会学优势。此外,由于大多数原意主义者认为权利应该深深植根于历史和传统,正如美国最高法院在华盛顿诉格鲁克斯伯格案中所做的那样,他们应该对1791年和1868年的数据感兴趣。相比之下,倡导“活宪法”的人应该对2018年的数据感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual Rights under State Constitutions in 2018: What Rights Are Deeply Rooted in a Modern-Day Consensus of the States?
This law review article describes what individual rights are protected under state constitutional law today in 2018; in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified; and in 1791, when the federal Bill of Rights was ratified. We seek to offer a picture over time as to what rights have gone into style and what rights have fallen out of style over the last 227 years. State constitutions are much easier to amend than is the federal constitution, so they provide a good sociological vantage point from which to assess rights. Moreover, since most originalists think that rights should be deeply rooted in history and tradition, as the U.S. Supreme Court held in Washington v. Glucksberg, the 1791 and 1868 data ought to be of interest to them. In contrast, the 2018 data should be of interest to advocates of a living constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: In 1925, a group of eager and idealistic students founded the Notre Dame Lawyer. Its name was changed in 1982 to the Notre Dame Law Review, but all generations have remained committed to the original founders’ vision of a law review “synonymous with respect for law, and jealous of any unjust attacks upon it.” Today, the Law Review maintains its tradition of excellence, and its membership includes some of the most able and distinguished judges, professors, and practitioners in the country. Entirely student edited, the Law Review offers its members an invaluable occasion for training in precise analysis of legal problems and in clear and cogent presentation of legal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信