不同下划线分布下两个独立人口检验的实证比较

P. M. Medugu, Chajire Buba Pwalakino, Yaska Mutah, Dampha Gandada
{"title":"不同下划线分布下两个独立人口检验的实证比较","authors":"P. M. Medugu, Chajire Buba Pwalakino, Yaska Mutah, Dampha Gandada","doi":"10.9734/ajpas/2023/v24i1514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining whether sample differences in central tendency represent real differences in parent populations is a typical issue in applied research. If the conditions of normality, homogeneity of variance, and independence of errors are met, the t-test can be used for a two sample instance (two groups). However, the nonparametric equivalent is taken into account when these presumptions are violated. In order to determine which test is most effective and resilient to a certain distribution and sample size when samples are obtained from separate populations, the study compares the effectiveness and sensitivity of power of four test statistics. These tests were examined under normal and some skew distributions at sample size of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 45, and 50 using simulation. The most effective test for a given distribution and sample size was chosen using the power of each test computed. The study found that when data are taken from a normal distribution and tested at small and large sample sizes, respectively, the t-test and Welch test have the highest power, while the Median is the most resistant to uniform and gamma, and the Man-Whitney test is the most reliable for exponential distributions.","PeriodicalId":8532,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Comparison of Power of Two Independent Population Tests under Different Underlined Distributions\",\"authors\":\"P. M. Medugu, Chajire Buba Pwalakino, Yaska Mutah, Dampha Gandada\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajpas/2023/v24i1514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining whether sample differences in central tendency represent real differences in parent populations is a typical issue in applied research. If the conditions of normality, homogeneity of variance, and independence of errors are met, the t-test can be used for a two sample instance (two groups). However, the nonparametric equivalent is taken into account when these presumptions are violated. In order to determine which test is most effective and resilient to a certain distribution and sample size when samples are obtained from separate populations, the study compares the effectiveness and sensitivity of power of four test statistics. These tests were examined under normal and some skew distributions at sample size of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 45, and 50 using simulation. The most effective test for a given distribution and sample size was chosen using the power of each test computed. The study found that when data are taken from a normal distribution and tested at small and large sample sizes, respectively, the t-test and Welch test have the highest power, while the Median is the most resistant to uniform and gamma, and the Man-Whitney test is the most reliable for exponential distributions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2023/v24i1514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2023/v24i1514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定集中趋势的样本差异是否代表亲本群体的真实差异是应用研究中的一个典型问题。如果满足正态性、方差齐性和误差独立性的条件,则可以对两个样本实例(两组)进行t检验。然而,当违反这些假设时,要考虑非参数等效。当样本来自不同的群体时,为了确定哪个检验对一定的分布和样本量最有效和有弹性,本研究比较了四种检验统计量的有效性和灵敏度。在5、10、15、20、25、30、40、45和50的样本量下,这些测试在正态分布和一些偏态分布下进行了模拟检验。对于给定的分布和样本量,使用计算的每个测试的功率来选择最有效的测试。研究发现,当数据来自正态分布并分别在小样本量和大样本量下进行检验时,t检验和Welch检验具有最高的功率,而中位数检验最能抵抗均匀和伽马,而Man-Whitney检验对指数分布最可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Comparison of Power of Two Independent Population Tests under Different Underlined Distributions
Determining whether sample differences in central tendency represent real differences in parent populations is a typical issue in applied research. If the conditions of normality, homogeneity of variance, and independence of errors are met, the t-test can be used for a two sample instance (two groups). However, the nonparametric equivalent is taken into account when these presumptions are violated. In order to determine which test is most effective and resilient to a certain distribution and sample size when samples are obtained from separate populations, the study compares the effectiveness and sensitivity of power of four test statistics. These tests were examined under normal and some skew distributions at sample size of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 45, and 50 using simulation. The most effective test for a given distribution and sample size was chosen using the power of each test computed. The study found that when data are taken from a normal distribution and tested at small and large sample sizes, respectively, the t-test and Welch test have the highest power, while the Median is the most resistant to uniform and gamma, and the Man-Whitney test is the most reliable for exponential distributions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信