电子档案作为形成性评估

IF 0.1 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Nuño Aguirre de Cárcer Girón, A. Mendoza
{"title":"电子档案作为形成性评估","authors":"Nuño Aguirre de Cárcer Girón, A. Mendoza","doi":"10.30687/978-88-6969-529-2/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter proposes the use of digital portfolios, an innovative formative assessment practice, in the area of the humanities. An initial discussion on the importance of formative assessment practices that integrate digital tools is followed by a detailed description of the methodological principles of portfolios and how to design them, and how to integrate the digital component in its design. We conclude that assessment as reading, as opposed to the traditional summative assessment of reading, is a promising area of innovation in the pedagogy of the Humanities.","PeriodicalId":40501,"journal":{"name":"Cartagine-Studi e Ricerche","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Portfolios as Formative Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Nuño Aguirre de Cárcer Girón, A. Mendoza\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/978-88-6969-529-2/006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter proposes the use of digital portfolios, an innovative formative assessment practice, in the area of the humanities. An initial discussion on the importance of formative assessment practices that integrate digital tools is followed by a detailed description of the methodological principles of portfolios and how to design them, and how to integrate the digital component in its design. We conclude that assessment as reading, as opposed to the traditional summative assessment of reading, is a promising area of innovation in the pedagogy of the Humanities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cartagine-Studi e Ricerche\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cartagine-Studi e Ricerche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-529-2/006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cartagine-Studi e Ricerche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-529-2/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章建议在人文学科领域使用数字作品集,这是一种创新的形成性评估实践。首先讨论整合数字工具的形成性评估实践的重要性,然后详细描述投资组合的方法论原则,以及如何设计它们,以及如何在其设计中集成数字组件。我们得出结论,作为阅读的评估,而不是传统的总结性阅读评估,是人文学科教学法创新的一个有前途的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-Portfolios as Formative Assessment
This chapter proposes the use of digital portfolios, an innovative formative assessment practice, in the area of the humanities. An initial discussion on the importance of formative assessment practices that integrate digital tools is followed by a detailed description of the methodological principles of portfolios and how to design them, and how to integrate the digital component in its design. We conclude that assessment as reading, as opposed to the traditional summative assessment of reading, is a promising area of innovation in the pedagogy of the Humanities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
66.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信