几种吸烟方式对牙周炎非手术治疗效果的影响。

Nouran Abdelmaged, Osama El-Shall, Zienab Farid
{"title":"几种吸烟方式对牙周炎非手术治疗效果的影响。","authors":"Nouran Abdelmaged, Osama El-Shall, Zienab Farid","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.136685.1508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : The aim of the current study was to compare and contrast the effects of various smoking types. This study focused on traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products compared with non-smokers on the outcome of non-surgical treatment of moderate generalized periodontitis. Subjects and methods : The present study included a total of sixty (60) patients with moderate generalized chronic periodontitis. They were divided into four equivalent groups to be managed with non-surgical mechanical debridement. The clinical results of the study were evaluated using Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Pocket depth measurements, and Clinical attachment level. The clinical measurements were obtained at the baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months intervals. Samples of gingival crevicular fluid were collected from periodontal pockets at the site of periodontal treatment at the same intervals of clinical evaluation. The collected samples were analyzed for detection of interleukin 8 (IL8), and Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) levels. Results : Non-smoker group showed the best improvement of the clinical parameters and the lowest level of the inflammatory cytokines followed by the HTPs smokers then E-cigarette smokers’. Furthermore, traditional smokers showed the least improvement of the clinical parameters and highest level of the inflammatory cytokines. Conclusion : The present study revealed that different types of smoking affect the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy. Comparing between HTPs, vaping, and traditional smoking, HTPs have the least effect on periodontal therapy, vaping has the moderate effect and traditional smoking has the strongest effect.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Some Types of Smoking on the Outcome of Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy of Periodontitis Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nouran Abdelmaged, Osama El-Shall, Zienab Farid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjg.2022.136685.1508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : The aim of the current study was to compare and contrast the effects of various smoking types. This study focused on traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products compared with non-smokers on the outcome of non-surgical treatment of moderate generalized periodontitis. Subjects and methods : The present study included a total of sixty (60) patients with moderate generalized chronic periodontitis. They were divided into four equivalent groups to be managed with non-surgical mechanical debridement. The clinical results of the study were evaluated using Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Pocket depth measurements, and Clinical attachment level. The clinical measurements were obtained at the baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months intervals. Samples of gingival crevicular fluid were collected from periodontal pockets at the site of periodontal treatment at the same intervals of clinical evaluation. The collected samples were analyzed for detection of interleukin 8 (IL8), and Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) levels. Results : Non-smoker group showed the best improvement of the clinical parameters and the lowest level of the inflammatory cytokines followed by the HTPs smokers then E-cigarette smokers’. Furthermore, traditional smokers showed the least improvement of the clinical parameters and highest level of the inflammatory cytokines. Conclusion : The present study revealed that different types of smoking affect the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy. Comparing between HTPs, vaping, and traditional smoking, HTPs have the least effect on periodontal therapy, vaping has the moderate effect and traditional smoking has the strongest effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.136685.1508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.136685.1508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较和对比不同类型吸烟的影响。本研究将传统香烟、电子香烟和加热烟草制品与非吸烟者非手术治疗中度广泛性牙周炎的效果进行比较。研究对象和方法:本研究共纳入60例中度全身性慢性牙周炎患者。患者被分为4组,采用非手术机械清创。研究的临床结果通过菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙袋深度测量和临床依恋水平进行评估。临床测量分别在基线、1个月、3个月和6个月的间隔进行。在临床评估的相同时间间隔内,从牙周治疗部位的牙周袋中收集牙龈沟液样本。采集标本,检测白细胞介素8 (il - 8)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)水平。结果:非吸烟组临床指标改善最好,炎性细胞因子水平最低,其次为htp吸烟者,其次为电子烟吸烟者。此外,传统吸烟者的临床指标改善最小,炎症因子水平最高。结论:不同吸烟类型对牙周非手术治疗效果有影响。htp、电子烟和传统吸烟对牙周治疗的影响最小,电子烟效果中等,传统吸烟效果最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Some Types of Smoking on the Outcome of Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy of Periodontitis Patients.
Purpose : The aim of the current study was to compare and contrast the effects of various smoking types. This study focused on traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products compared with non-smokers on the outcome of non-surgical treatment of moderate generalized periodontitis. Subjects and methods : The present study included a total of sixty (60) patients with moderate generalized chronic periodontitis. They were divided into four equivalent groups to be managed with non-surgical mechanical debridement. The clinical results of the study were evaluated using Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Pocket depth measurements, and Clinical attachment level. The clinical measurements were obtained at the baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months intervals. Samples of gingival crevicular fluid were collected from periodontal pockets at the site of periodontal treatment at the same intervals of clinical evaluation. The collected samples were analyzed for detection of interleukin 8 (IL8), and Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) levels. Results : Non-smoker group showed the best improvement of the clinical parameters and the lowest level of the inflammatory cytokines followed by the HTPs smokers then E-cigarette smokers’. Furthermore, traditional smokers showed the least improvement of the clinical parameters and highest level of the inflammatory cytokines. Conclusion : The present study revealed that different types of smoking affect the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy. Comparing between HTPs, vaping, and traditional smoking, HTPs have the least effect on periodontal therapy, vaping has the moderate effect and traditional smoking has the strongest effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信