隐蔽性听力损失的推荐听觉脑干对刺激的反应和记录参数:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

Q3 Medicine
Yeoju Kim, Woojae Han
{"title":"隐蔽性听力损失的推荐听觉脑干对刺激的反应和记录参数:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Yeoju Kim, Woojae Han","doi":"10.21848/asr.220086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a lesion of hidden hearing loss (HHL) has focused on the sprial ganglion, stimulation and recording parameters for auditory brainstem response (ABR) are not yet specific enough to confirm its dysfunction. In the current review, we identify ABR parameters, especially Wave I, for diagnosing HHL through both a systemic review and meta-analysis of 14 articles retrieved from seven journal data bases. The most commonly used parameters were a click or 4 kHz tone burst as the stimulus at a rate of less than 11/sec at more than 80 dB intensity levels with alternating polarity through the ear canal. For quantitative results, our meta-analysis from eight articles demonstrated a significant difference in the overall effect size for amplitude between HHL patients and their counterparts with normal hearing. For the subgroup and its analysis, tone burst and high intensity level revealed significantly lower effect size in HHL patients compared to the control group, whereas the stimuli rate and electrode montage statstically were not statistical significance. Although we examined a small number of studies and their heterogenity, obtaining ABR Wave I was clinically differentiated when noise-induced HHL was considered. We thus suggest that stimulation and recording parameters should be applied to a large number of patients and thereby standardized as sensitive features for Wave I in the clinic.","PeriodicalId":36841,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Speech Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommended Auditory Brainstem Responses to Stimulation and Recording Parameters for Hidden Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yeoju Kim, Woojae Han\",\"doi\":\"10.21848/asr.220086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although a lesion of hidden hearing loss (HHL) has focused on the sprial ganglion, stimulation and recording parameters for auditory brainstem response (ABR) are not yet specific enough to confirm its dysfunction. In the current review, we identify ABR parameters, especially Wave I, for diagnosing HHL through both a systemic review and meta-analysis of 14 articles retrieved from seven journal data bases. The most commonly used parameters were a click or 4 kHz tone burst as the stimulus at a rate of less than 11/sec at more than 80 dB intensity levels with alternating polarity through the ear canal. For quantitative results, our meta-analysis from eight articles demonstrated a significant difference in the overall effect size for amplitude between HHL patients and their counterparts with normal hearing. For the subgroup and its analysis, tone burst and high intensity level revealed significantly lower effect size in HHL patients compared to the control group, whereas the stimuli rate and electrode montage statstically were not statistical significance. Although we examined a small number of studies and their heterogenity, obtaining ABR Wave I was clinically differentiated when noise-induced HHL was considered. We thus suggest that stimulation and recording parameters should be applied to a large number of patients and thereby standardized as sensitive features for Wave I in the clinic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Speech Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Speech Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.220086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Speech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.220086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然隐藏性听力损失(HHL)的病变主要集中在脊髓神经节,但听觉脑干反应(ABR)的刺激和记录参数尚不足以证实其功能障碍。在当前的综述中,我们通过对从7个期刊数据库中检索的14篇文章的系统评价和荟萃分析,确定了诊断HHL的ABR参数,特别是波I。最常用的参数是一声咔哒声或4千赫的音调爆发作为刺激,以低于11/秒的速度,在超过80分贝的强度水平上,通过耳道交替极性。对于定量结果,我们对八篇文章的荟萃分析表明,HHL患者和听力正常的患者在振幅的总体效应大小上存在显著差异。对于亚组及其分析,HHL患者的音调爆发和高强度水平的效应量明显低于对照组,而刺激率和电极蒙太奇的效应量无统计学意义。虽然我们检查了少量研究及其异质性,但当考虑噪声引起的HHL时,获得ABR波I在临床上是可以区分的。因此,我们建议刺激和记录参数应应用于大量患者,从而在临床中将其标准化为波I的敏感特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommended Auditory Brainstem Responses to Stimulation and Recording Parameters for Hidden Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Although a lesion of hidden hearing loss (HHL) has focused on the sprial ganglion, stimulation and recording parameters for auditory brainstem response (ABR) are not yet specific enough to confirm its dysfunction. In the current review, we identify ABR parameters, especially Wave I, for diagnosing HHL through both a systemic review and meta-analysis of 14 articles retrieved from seven journal data bases. The most commonly used parameters were a click or 4 kHz tone burst as the stimulus at a rate of less than 11/sec at more than 80 dB intensity levels with alternating polarity through the ear canal. For quantitative results, our meta-analysis from eight articles demonstrated a significant difference in the overall effect size for amplitude between HHL patients and their counterparts with normal hearing. For the subgroup and its analysis, tone burst and high intensity level revealed significantly lower effect size in HHL patients compared to the control group, whereas the stimuli rate and electrode montage statstically were not statistical significance. Although we examined a small number of studies and their heterogenity, obtaining ABR Wave I was clinically differentiated when noise-induced HHL was considered. We thus suggest that stimulation and recording parameters should be applied to a large number of patients and thereby standardized as sensitive features for Wave I in the clinic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Speech Research
Audiology and Speech Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信