关于阴茎增大手术的YouTube视频信息质量

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Perçin Karakol, Tuncay Taş
{"title":"关于阴茎增大手术的YouTube视频信息质量","authors":"Perçin Karakol, Tuncay Taş","doi":"10.33425/2689-1093.1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An increasing number of patients and their aesthetic curiosity are causing the online questioning of penis enlargement surgery (PES). Although there is a wealth of healthcare information about PES on the internet, the quality of PES-related information on YouTube, the most visited online video streaming service, has not fully known. It is aimed to evaluate the quality of information about PES in YouTube videos. Materials and Methods: In January 2021, we cross-sectionally performed YouTube search using the keywords \"penis enlargement surgery\", \"penis lengthening surgery\", or \"penis thickening surgery\". We sorted the videos as reliability in terms of containing scientifically proven information by 1 urologist and 1 plastic surgeon. Irrelevant, non-Turkish, and silent videos were not included. Video demographics were analyzed based on the quality and source of the video. A 5-point global quality scale, a 5-point reliability (DISCERN) tool, kappa statistic, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics in the form of proportions and percentages were used. Results: A total of one-hundred PES videos published on YouTube between 2015-2021 were searched. Thirty-nine of these videos were removed due to duplicate, irrelevant, lack of sound or misleading information. Deceptive videos had a significantly higher number of likes than useful videos. On the other hand, useful videos had significantly more views than misleading videos. Useful videos had a higher DISCERN score compared to misleading videos. The fact that the uploader was sourced by professionals and doctors working at universities significantly contributed to the usefulness of the videos. Conclusion: As searching for information about PES on YouTube, patients are exposed to low-quality and confusing videos. Complexity in the number of views and likes could make accessing the informative PES video difficult. It may be recommended that patients prefer PES videos created by professionals.","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Penis Enlargement Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Perçin Karakol, Tuncay Taş\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2689-1093.1039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: An increasing number of patients and their aesthetic curiosity are causing the online questioning of penis enlargement surgery (PES). Although there is a wealth of healthcare information about PES on the internet, the quality of PES-related information on YouTube, the most visited online video streaming service, has not fully known. It is aimed to evaluate the quality of information about PES in YouTube videos. Materials and Methods: In January 2021, we cross-sectionally performed YouTube search using the keywords \\\"penis enlargement surgery\\\", \\\"penis lengthening surgery\\\", or \\\"penis thickening surgery\\\". We sorted the videos as reliability in terms of containing scientifically proven information by 1 urologist and 1 plastic surgeon. Irrelevant, non-Turkish, and silent videos were not included. Video demographics were analyzed based on the quality and source of the video. A 5-point global quality scale, a 5-point reliability (DISCERN) tool, kappa statistic, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics in the form of proportions and percentages were used. Results: A total of one-hundred PES videos published on YouTube between 2015-2021 were searched. Thirty-nine of these videos were removed due to duplicate, irrelevant, lack of sound or misleading information. Deceptive videos had a significantly higher number of likes than useful videos. On the other hand, useful videos had significantly more views than misleading videos. Useful videos had a higher DISCERN score compared to misleading videos. The fact that the uploader was sourced by professionals and doctors working at universities significantly contributed to the usefulness of the videos. Conclusion: As searching for information about PES on YouTube, patients are exposed to low-quality and confusing videos. Complexity in the number of views and likes could make accessing the informative PES video difficult. It may be recommended that patients prefer PES videos created by professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2689-1093.1039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2689-1093.1039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的患者和他们的审美好奇心引起了网上对阴茎增大手术(PES)的质疑。尽管互联网上有大量关于PES的医疗信息,但在访问量最大的在线视频流媒体服务YouTube上,PES相关信息的质量尚不完全清楚。它旨在评估YouTube视频中关于PES的信息质量。材料与方法:2021年1月,我们在YouTube上横断面搜索关键词“阴茎增大手术”、“阴茎延长手术”或“阴茎增厚手术”。我们根据1名泌尿科医生和1名整形外科医生的科学证明信息对视频进行了可靠性排序。不相关的、非土耳其的和无声的视频不包括在内。根据视频的质量和来源对视频进行人口统计分析。采用了5点整体质量量表、5点信度(DISCERN)工具、kappa统计、类内相关系数和以比例和百分比形式表示的描述性统计。结果:共检索到2015-2021年间在YouTube上发布的100个PES视频。其中39个视频因重复、不相关、缺乏声音或误导性信息而被删除。欺骗性视频的点赞数明显高于有用视频。另一方面,有用视频的浏览量明显高于误导性视频。与误导视频相比,有用视频的DISCERN得分更高。事实上,上传者的来源是在大学工作的专业人士和医生,这极大地促进了视频的有用性。结论:在YouTube上搜索PES相关信息时,患者所接触到的视频质量较低且容易混淆。观看次数和喜欢次数的复杂性可能会使访问内容丰富的PES视频变得困难。建议患者选择专业人士制作的PES视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Penis Enlargement Surgery
Background: An increasing number of patients and their aesthetic curiosity are causing the online questioning of penis enlargement surgery (PES). Although there is a wealth of healthcare information about PES on the internet, the quality of PES-related information on YouTube, the most visited online video streaming service, has not fully known. It is aimed to evaluate the quality of information about PES in YouTube videos. Materials and Methods: In January 2021, we cross-sectionally performed YouTube search using the keywords "penis enlargement surgery", "penis lengthening surgery", or "penis thickening surgery". We sorted the videos as reliability in terms of containing scientifically proven information by 1 urologist and 1 plastic surgeon. Irrelevant, non-Turkish, and silent videos were not included. Video demographics were analyzed based on the quality and source of the video. A 5-point global quality scale, a 5-point reliability (DISCERN) tool, kappa statistic, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and descriptive statistics in the form of proportions and percentages were used. Results: A total of one-hundred PES videos published on YouTube between 2015-2021 were searched. Thirty-nine of these videos were removed due to duplicate, irrelevant, lack of sound or misleading information. Deceptive videos had a significantly higher number of likes than useful videos. On the other hand, useful videos had significantly more views than misleading videos. Useful videos had a higher DISCERN score compared to misleading videos. The fact that the uploader was sourced by professionals and doctors working at universities significantly contributed to the usefulness of the videos. Conclusion: As searching for information about PES on YouTube, patients are exposed to low-quality and confusing videos. Complexity in the number of views and likes could make accessing the informative PES video difficult. It may be recommended that patients prefer PES videos created by professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信