最温和的激进恶魔学家?让·博丹的《魔法师》的两栖性质

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
PARERGON Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1353/pgn.2023.a905416
F. A. Campagne
{"title":"最温和的激进恶魔学家?让·博丹的《魔法师》的两栖性质","authors":"F. A. Campagne","doi":"10.1353/pgn.2023.a905416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The ‘Démonomanie des sorciers’ by Jean Bodin is, along with the ‘Malleus maleficarum’, not only one of the most famous demonologies ever written but one of the most commercially successful. However, one aspect of its argumentation seems to have been overlooked by scholars so far: the paradoxical coexistence of the providentialist foundations of Bodin’s doctrine, typical of the moderate demonology of the Church Fathers, and the merciless brutality of the suggested judicial procedure for the extermination of witchcraft. In other words, the harsh repressive stance associated with Bodin’s book does not follow logically from the Augustinian basis of his anti-scholastic demonology. The key to understanding this inconsistency lies in Bodin’s non-confessional political theory, for which atheism (one of whose evergreen incarnations is witchcraft) should be seen as the most dreadful enemy of any state, regardless of its Christian or non-Christian origins.","PeriodicalId":43576,"journal":{"name":"PARERGON","volume":"59 1","pages":"130 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Moderate of Radical Demonologists? The Amphibian Nature of Jean Bodin’s Démonomanie des sorciers\",\"authors\":\"F. A. Campagne\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pgn.2023.a905416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The ‘Démonomanie des sorciers’ by Jean Bodin is, along with the ‘Malleus maleficarum’, not only one of the most famous demonologies ever written but one of the most commercially successful. However, one aspect of its argumentation seems to have been overlooked by scholars so far: the paradoxical coexistence of the providentialist foundations of Bodin’s doctrine, typical of the moderate demonology of the Church Fathers, and the merciless brutality of the suggested judicial procedure for the extermination of witchcraft. In other words, the harsh repressive stance associated with Bodin’s book does not follow logically from the Augustinian basis of his anti-scholastic demonology. The key to understanding this inconsistency lies in Bodin’s non-confessional political theory, for which atheism (one of whose evergreen incarnations is witchcraft) should be seen as the most dreadful enemy of any state, regardless of its Christian or non-Christian origins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PARERGON\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PARERGON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2023.a905416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PARERGON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2023.a905416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:让·博丹的《魔头》和《魔头》不仅是有史以来最著名的恶魔论著作之一,也是商业上最成功的著作之一。然而,到目前为止,其论证的一个方面似乎被学者们忽视了:博丹教义的天意主义基础的矛盾共存,典型的温和的教父的恶魔学,以及为消灭巫术而建议的司法程序的无情暴行。换句话说,与博丹的书有关的严厉压抑的立场,与他的反经院恶魔学的奥古斯丁基础逻辑不符。理解这种不一致的关键在于博丹的非宗教政治理论,在这个理论中,无神论(其常青的化身之一是巫术)应该被视为任何国家最可怕的敌人,无论其起源是基督教还是非基督教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Most Moderate of Radical Demonologists? The Amphibian Nature of Jean Bodin’s Démonomanie des sorciers
Abstract:The ‘Démonomanie des sorciers’ by Jean Bodin is, along with the ‘Malleus maleficarum’, not only one of the most famous demonologies ever written but one of the most commercially successful. However, one aspect of its argumentation seems to have been overlooked by scholars so far: the paradoxical coexistence of the providentialist foundations of Bodin’s doctrine, typical of the moderate demonology of the Church Fathers, and the merciless brutality of the suggested judicial procedure for the extermination of witchcraft. In other words, the harsh repressive stance associated with Bodin’s book does not follow logically from the Augustinian basis of his anti-scholastic demonology. The key to understanding this inconsistency lies in Bodin’s non-confessional political theory, for which atheism (one of whose evergreen incarnations is witchcraft) should be seen as the most dreadful enemy of any state, regardless of its Christian or non-Christian origins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PARERGON
PARERGON MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Parergon publishes articles and book reviews on all aspects of medieval and early modern studies. It has a particular focus on research which takes new approaches and crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries. Fully refereed and with an international Advisory Board, Parergon is the Southern Hemisphere"s leading journal for early European research. It is published by the Australian and New Zealand Association of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (Inc.) and has close links with the ARC Network for Early European Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信