癌症相关疲劳临床实践指南质量评价

Q3 Medicine

Evidence Based Care Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.22038/EBCJ.2018.31619.1788

Shahin Salarvand, S. Hemati, P. Adibi, F. Taleghani, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh

{"title":"癌症相关疲劳临床实践指南质量评价","authors":"Shahin Salarvand, S. Hemati, P. Adibi, F. Taleghani, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh","doi":"10.22038/EBCJ.2018.31619.1788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Improvement of the quality ofcancer-related fatigue clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an important issue in oncology. Aim: This study aimed to determine the methodological quality of CPGs about cancer-related fatigue management using the AGREE II instrument. Method: This study involved a systematic search, followed by a descriptive study, to evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs about CRF using the AGREE II instrument in 2018. A comprehensive search was conducted on different websites and databases to find the eligible published guidelines from the observation time to Jan 2018. After screening the guidelines based on eligibility criteria, the selected CPGs were assessed by five independent appraisers by means of the updated AGREE II instrument developed in 2013. Results: According to the results, applicability and editorial independence domains had obtained low quality scores. However, the scores of the rest of the domains were indicative of a favorable quality level. Implications for Practice: It is essential to improve the quality of CRF CPGs and design high-quality CPGs especially in terms of applicability and editorial independence domains.Â Â","PeriodicalId":37304,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Care Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"64-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Quality of Cancer-Related Fatigue Clinical Practice Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Shahin Salarvand, S. Hemati, P. Adibi, F. Taleghani, Reza Ghanei Gheshlagh\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/EBCJ.2018.31619.1788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Improvement of the quality ofcancer-related fatigue clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an important issue in oncology. Aim: This study aimed to determine the methodological quality of CPGs about cancer-related fatigue management using the AGREE II instrument. Method: This study involved a systematic search, followed by a descriptive study, to evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs about CRF using the AGREE II instrument in 2018. A comprehensive search was conducted on different websites and databases to find the eligible published guidelines from the observation time to Jan 2018. After screening the guidelines based on eligibility criteria, the selected CPGs were assessed by five independent appraisers by means of the updated AGREE II instrument developed in 2013. Results: According to the results, applicability and editorial independence domains had obtained low quality scores. However, the scores of the rest of the domains were indicative of a favorable quality level. Implications for Practice: It is essential to improve the quality of CRF CPGs and design high-quality CPGs especially in terms of applicability and editorial independence domains.Â Â\",\"PeriodicalId\":37304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"64-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2018.31619.1788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/EBCJ.2018.31619.1788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:提高肿瘤相关疲劳临床实践指南(CPGs)的质量是肿瘤学的一个重要问题。目的:本研究旨在利用AGREE II仪器确定癌症相关疲劳管理CPGs的方法学质量。方法:本研究通过系统检索和描述性研究，利用2018年AGREE II仪器评估CRF CPGs的方法学质量。我们在不同的网站和数据库上进行了全面的检索，以找到从观察时间到2018年1月合格的已发表指南。在根据资格标准筛选指南后，选定的cpg由五名独立评估师通过2013年开发的更新的AGREE II工具进行评估。结果:结果显示，适用性和编辑独立性领域获得了较低的质量分数。然而，其他领域的得分表明了良好的质量水平。对实践的启示:提高CRF cpg的质量和设计高质量的cpg是至关重要的，特别是在适用性和编辑独立性方面。一个一个

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of the Quality of Cancer-Related Fatigue Clinical Practice Guidelines

Background: Improvement of the quality ofcancer-related fatigue clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an important issue in oncology. Aim: This study aimed to determine the methodological quality of CPGs about cancer-related fatigue management using the AGREE II instrument. Method: This study involved a systematic search, followed by a descriptive study, to evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs about CRF using the AGREE II instrument in 2018. A comprehensive search was conducted on different websites and databases to find the eligible published guidelines from the observation time to Jan 2018. After screening the guidelines based on eligibility criteria, the selected CPGs were assessed by five independent appraisers by means of the updated AGREE II instrument developed in 2013. Results: According to the results, applicability and editorial independence domains had obtained low quality scores. However, the scores of the rest of the domains were indicative of a favorable quality level. Implications for Practice: It is essential to improve the quality of CRF CPGs and design high-quality CPGs especially in terms of applicability and editorial independence domains.Â Â

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Evidence Based Care Journal Medicine-Health Policy

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Evidence Based Care Journal (EBCJ) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of patient care. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports patient care in practice. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, EBCJ seeks to enrich insight into clinical needs and the implications for patient care intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on clinical practicality of research findings and strength of study design. EBCJ is essential reading for anyone involved in healthcare professions, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on patient care.