注视与视野偏好相关:比较自然和城市场景

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
A. Batool, P. Rutherford, P. McGraw, T. Ledgeway, S. Altomonte
{"title":"注视与视野偏好相关:比较自然和城市场景","authors":"A. Batool, P. Rutherford, P. McGraw, T. Ledgeway, S. Altomonte","doi":"10.1177/14771535211055703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When looking out of a window, natural views are usually associated with restorative qualities and are given a higher preference than urban scenes. Previous research has shown that gaze behaviour might differ based on the natural or urban content of views. A lower number of fixations has been associated with the aesthetic evaluation of natural scenes while, when looking at an urban environment, a high preference has been correlated with more exploratory gaze behaviours. To characterise gaze correlates of view preference across natural and urban scenes, we collected and analysed experimental data featuring subjective preference ratings, eye-tracking measures, verbal reasoning associated with preference and nature relatedness scores. Consistent with the literature, our results confirm that natural scenes are more preferred than urban views and that gaze behaviours depend on view type and preference. Observing natural scenes was characterised by lower numbers of fixations and saccades, and longer fixation durations, compared to urban views. However, for both view types, most preferred scenes led to more fixations and saccades. Our findings also showed that nature relatedness may be correlated with visual exploration of scenes. Individual preferences and personality attributes, therefore, should be accounted for in studies on view preference and gaze behaviour.","PeriodicalId":18133,"journal":{"name":"Lighting Research & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaze correlates of view preference: Comparing natural and urban scenes\",\"authors\":\"A. Batool, P. Rutherford, P. McGraw, T. Ledgeway, S. Altomonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14771535211055703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When looking out of a window, natural views are usually associated with restorative qualities and are given a higher preference than urban scenes. Previous research has shown that gaze behaviour might differ based on the natural or urban content of views. A lower number of fixations has been associated with the aesthetic evaluation of natural scenes while, when looking at an urban environment, a high preference has been correlated with more exploratory gaze behaviours. To characterise gaze correlates of view preference across natural and urban scenes, we collected and analysed experimental data featuring subjective preference ratings, eye-tracking measures, verbal reasoning associated with preference and nature relatedness scores. Consistent with the literature, our results confirm that natural scenes are more preferred than urban views and that gaze behaviours depend on view type and preference. Observing natural scenes was characterised by lower numbers of fixations and saccades, and longer fixation durations, compared to urban views. However, for both view types, most preferred scenes led to more fixations and saccades. Our findings also showed that nature relatedness may be correlated with visual exploration of scenes. Individual preferences and personality attributes, therefore, should be accounted for in studies on view preference and gaze behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lighting Research & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lighting Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211055703\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lighting Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211055703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

当向窗外看时,自然景观通常与恢复性的品质联系在一起,比城市景观更受青睐。先前的研究表明,凝视行为可能会因自然或城市内容的不同而有所不同。较低的注视次数与自然场景的审美评价有关,而在看城市环境时,高度偏好与更多的探索性注视行为有关。为了描述自然和城市场景中视角偏好的凝视相关性,我们收集并分析了实验数据,包括主观偏好评分、眼球追踪测量、与偏好相关的言语推理和自然相关性评分。与文献一致,我们的研究结果证实,自然景观比城市景观更受欢迎,注视行为取决于景观类型和偏好。与城市景观相比,观察自然景观的特点是注视和扫视次数较少,注视持续时间更长。然而,对于这两种视图类型,最喜欢的场景导致更多的注视和扫视。我们的研究结果还表明,与自然的亲缘关系可能与对场景的视觉探索有关。因此,在观察偏好和凝视行为的研究中,个体偏好和人格属性应该被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaze correlates of view preference: Comparing natural and urban scenes
When looking out of a window, natural views are usually associated with restorative qualities and are given a higher preference than urban scenes. Previous research has shown that gaze behaviour might differ based on the natural or urban content of views. A lower number of fixations has been associated with the aesthetic evaluation of natural scenes while, when looking at an urban environment, a high preference has been correlated with more exploratory gaze behaviours. To characterise gaze correlates of view preference across natural and urban scenes, we collected and analysed experimental data featuring subjective preference ratings, eye-tracking measures, verbal reasoning associated with preference and nature relatedness scores. Consistent with the literature, our results confirm that natural scenes are more preferred than urban views and that gaze behaviours depend on view type and preference. Observing natural scenes was characterised by lower numbers of fixations and saccades, and longer fixation durations, compared to urban views. However, for both view types, most preferred scenes led to more fixations and saccades. Our findings also showed that nature relatedness may be correlated with visual exploration of scenes. Individual preferences and personality attributes, therefore, should be accounted for in studies on view preference and gaze behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lighting Research & Technology
Lighting Research & Technology 工程技术-光学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lighting Research & Technology (LR&T) publishes original peer-reviewed research on all aspects of light and lighting and is published in association with The Society of Light and Lighting. LR&T covers the human response to light, the science of light generation, light control and measurement plus lighting design for both interior and exterior environments, as well as daylighting, energy efficiency and sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信