合成术士西蒙

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1017/s0028688522000030

David L. Eastman

{"title":"合成术士西蒙","authors":"David L. Eastman","doi":"10.1017/s0028688522000030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Simon Magus is a key figure in the earliest apocryphal Acts of Peter. He is a sorcerer and confidant of the emperor who clashes with Peter and, in later apocryphal texts, with both Peter and Paul. However, this is not simply the villain of the Acts of the Apostles. In this article I will argue that the apocryphal Simon is a composite figure drawn substantially, but not necessarily wholly, from the Simon of Acts 8 and the Elymas/Bar-Jesus figure who opposes Paul in Acts 13.","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"2001 1","pages":"407 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simon the Composite Sorcerer\",\"authors\":\"David L. Eastman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0028688522000030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Simon Magus is a key figure in the earliest apocryphal Acts of Peter. He is a sorcerer and confidant of the emperor who clashes with Peter and, in later apocryphal texts, with both Peter and Paul. However, this is not simply the villain of the Acts of the Apostles. In this article I will argue that the apocryphal Simon is a composite figure drawn substantially, but not necessarily wholly, from the Simon of Acts 8 and the Elymas/Bar-Jesus figure who opposes Paul in Acts 13.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"volume\":\"2001 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688522000030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Testament Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0028688522000030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

魔法师西蒙是最早的伪经《彼得传》中的关键人物。他是一个巫师和皇帝的心腹，他与彼得发生冲突，在后来的伪经中，他与彼得和保罗都有冲突。然而，这不仅仅是使徒行传中的恶棍。在这篇文章中，我将论证，伪经西门是一个复合的人物，从使徒行传第8章的西门和使徒行传第13章中反对保罗的以吕马/巴耶稣的人物中提取出来，但不一定是全部。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Simon the Composite Sorcerer

Abstract Simon Magus is a key figure in the earliest apocryphal Acts of Peter. He is a sorcerer and confidant of the emperor who clashes with Peter and, in later apocryphal texts, with both Peter and Paul. However, this is not simply the villain of the Acts of the Apostles. In this article I will argue that the apocryphal Simon is a composite figure drawn substantially, but not necessarily wholly, from the Simon of Acts 8 and the Elymas/Bar-Jesus figure who opposes Paul in Acts 13.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Testament Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Testament Studies is an international peer-reviewed periodical whose contributors include the leading New Testament scholars writing in the world today. The journal publishes original articles and short studies in English, French and German on a wide range of issues pertaining to the origins, history, context and theology of the New Testament and early Christianity. All contributions represent research at the cutting edge of the discipline, which has developed a wide range of methods. The journal welcomes submissions employing any such methods in recent years. The periodical embraces exegetical, historical, literary-critical, sociological, theological and other approaches to the New Testament, including studies in its history of interpretation and effects.