司机服从停车和减速标志

W. Jackman
{"title":"司机服从停车和减速标志","authors":"W. Jackman","doi":"10.5703/1288284313503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STANDARD MANUFACTURED STOP AND SLOW SIGNS. FOUR OF THE STOP SIGNS USED WERE OF THE NEW TYPE (RED AND WHITE, REFLECTORIZED), THE REMAINING STOP SIGN AND THE SLOW SIGN WERE OF THE OLD TYPE (YELLOW AND BLACK ENAMEL, NON-REFLECTORIZED). IN ADDITION TO THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF, THE SLOW SIGN STUDY UTILIZED A RADAR METER AND A PNEUMATIC TUBE SPEED METER. THE STUDY SHOWED THAT NO COMBINATION OF STOP SIGN TYPE OR POSITION WAS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN ANY OTHER UNDER THE GIVEN CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO WEIGH THE INFORMATION GATHERED AND ASSIGN DEFINITE OBEDIENCE FACTORS TO THE SIGN TYPE-POSITION COMBINATIONS STUDIED. THE STUDY ALSO SHOWED THAT A SLOW SIGN PLACED AT A LOCATION WHICH OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT WARRANT IT, IS DEFINITELY INEFFECTIVE. THIS SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT THE AVERAGE DRIVER IS INFLUENCED BY THE APPARENT FACTORS INVOLVED RATHER THAN BY THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF. /AUTHOR/","PeriodicalId":12918,"journal":{"name":"Highway Research Board bulletin","volume":"33 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1957-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driver obedience to stop and slow signs\",\"authors\":\"W. Jackman\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/1288284313503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STANDARD MANUFACTURED STOP AND SLOW SIGNS. FOUR OF THE STOP SIGNS USED WERE OF THE NEW TYPE (RED AND WHITE, REFLECTORIZED), THE REMAINING STOP SIGN AND THE SLOW SIGN WERE OF THE OLD TYPE (YELLOW AND BLACK ENAMEL, NON-REFLECTORIZED). IN ADDITION TO THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF, THE SLOW SIGN STUDY UTILIZED A RADAR METER AND A PNEUMATIC TUBE SPEED METER. THE STUDY SHOWED THAT NO COMBINATION OF STOP SIGN TYPE OR POSITION WAS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN ANY OTHER UNDER THE GIVEN CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO WEIGH THE INFORMATION GATHERED AND ASSIGN DEFINITE OBEDIENCE FACTORS TO THE SIGN TYPE-POSITION COMBINATIONS STUDIED. THE STUDY ALSO SHOWED THAT A SLOW SIGN PLACED AT A LOCATION WHICH OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT WARRANT IT, IS DEFINITELY INEFFECTIVE. THIS SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT THE AVERAGE DRIVER IS INFLUENCED BY THE APPARENT FACTORS INVOLVED RATHER THAN BY THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF. /AUTHOR/\",\"PeriodicalId\":12918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Highway Research Board bulletin\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"9-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1957-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Highway Research Board bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Highway Research Board bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284313503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是确定标准制造的停止和慢速标志的有效性。使用的四个停止标志是新型的(红色和白色,反光),其余的停止标志和慢速标志是老式的(黄色和黑色搪瓷,非反光)。除了慢速标志本身之外,慢速标志研究还使用了雷达仪表和气动管速度计。研究表明,在给定条件下,没有任何一种停止标志类型或位置的组合比其他任何组合都更有效。然而,我们试图权衡收集到的信息,并为所研究的符号类型-位置组合分配明确的服从因素。该研究还表明,在一个明显不值得的地方放置一个慢速标志,绝对是无效的。这似乎表明,一般司机是受相关因素的影响,而不是受慢速标志本身的影响。/作者/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Driver obedience to stop and slow signs
THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STANDARD MANUFACTURED STOP AND SLOW SIGNS. FOUR OF THE STOP SIGNS USED WERE OF THE NEW TYPE (RED AND WHITE, REFLECTORIZED), THE REMAINING STOP SIGN AND THE SLOW SIGN WERE OF THE OLD TYPE (YELLOW AND BLACK ENAMEL, NON-REFLECTORIZED). IN ADDITION TO THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF, THE SLOW SIGN STUDY UTILIZED A RADAR METER AND A PNEUMATIC TUBE SPEED METER. THE STUDY SHOWED THAT NO COMBINATION OF STOP SIGN TYPE OR POSITION WAS MORE EFFECTIVE THAN ANY OTHER UNDER THE GIVEN CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO WEIGH THE INFORMATION GATHERED AND ASSIGN DEFINITE OBEDIENCE FACTORS TO THE SIGN TYPE-POSITION COMBINATIONS STUDIED. THE STUDY ALSO SHOWED THAT A SLOW SIGN PLACED AT A LOCATION WHICH OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT WARRANT IT, IS DEFINITELY INEFFECTIVE. THIS SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT THE AVERAGE DRIVER IS INFLUENCED BY THE APPARENT FACTORS INVOLVED RATHER THAN BY THE SLOW SIGN ITSELF. /AUTHOR/
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信