发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

伊朗英语学习者的认知风格及其对概念隐喻的解释

Q3 Social Sciences
International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010105
Somaye Piri, D. Tafazoli
{"title":"伊朗英语学习者的认知风格及其对概念隐喻的解释","authors":"Somaye Piri, D. Tafazoli","doi":"10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ThecurrentstudyaimstoinvestigateIranianEFLlearners’cognitivestylesandtheirexplanationsof conceptualmetaphors,offeringapossiblerangeofindividualdifferencesinmetaphorprocessing.71 participantswereaskedtoexplainsomeestablishedconceptualmetaphorsthatarecommonlyused inEnglish.Then,theircognitivestyleswereclassifiedinto“analytic”or“holistic”and“imager”or “verbalizer”bymeansofcognitivestylestest.Dataanalysisrevealedthat29participants(40.85%) explained the threeconceptualmetaphorsbymaking structural correspondencesbetweensource andtargetdomain.Moreover,20participants(28.17%)explainedatleastoneofthemetaphorsby applyingelementswhichwerenotpartofthesourcedomain.Theresultsoftheexperimentrevealed thatlearnerswith“holistic”cognitivestylesweremorelikelytoblendtheirconceptionofthetarget domainwiththesourcedomainincomparisontoparticipantswith“analytic”styles;also,“imagers” weremorelikelythan“verbalizers”torefertostereotypicalimagestoexplainthemetaphors. KEywoRdS Analytic, Cognitive Style, Conceptual Metaphor, Holistic, Imager, Verbalizer","PeriodicalId":53545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments","volume":"23 1","pages":"68-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iranian EFL Learners' Cognitive Styles and Their Explanations of Conceptual Metaphors\",\"authors\":\"Somaye Piri, D. Tafazoli\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ThecurrentstudyaimstoinvestigateIranianEFLlearners’cognitivestylesandtheirexplanationsof conceptualmetaphors,offeringapossiblerangeofindividualdifferencesinmetaphorprocessing.71 participantswereaskedtoexplainsomeestablishedconceptualmetaphorsthatarecommonlyused inEnglish.Then,theircognitivestyleswereclassifiedinto“analytic”or“holistic”and“imager”or “verbalizer”bymeansofcognitivestylestest.Dataanalysisrevealedthat29participants(40.85%) explained the threeconceptualmetaphorsbymaking structural correspondencesbetweensource andtargetdomain.Moreover,20participants(28.17%)explainedatleastoneofthemetaphorsby applyingelementswhichwerenotpartofthesourcedomain.Theresultsoftheexperimentrevealed thatlearnerswith“holistic”cognitivestylesweremorelikelytoblendtheirconceptionofthetarget domainwiththesourcedomainincomparisontoparticipantswith“analytic”styles;also,“imagers” weremorelikelythan“verbalizers”torefertostereotypicalimagestoexplainthemetaphors. KEywoRdS Analytic, Cognitive Style, Conceptual Metaphor, Holistic, Imager, Verbalizer\",\"PeriodicalId\":53545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"68-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2018010105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

ThecurrentstudyaimstoinvestigateIranianEFLlearners ' cognitivestylesandtheirexplanationsof conceptualmetaphors，offeringapossiblerangeofindividualdifferencesinmetaphorprocessing。71 participantswereaskedtoexplainsomeestablishedconceptualmetaphorsthatarecommonlyused inEnglish。,他们的认知风格分为“分析”或,“整体”“成像仪”,的“唠叨”认知风格测试手段。数据分析揭示了,29日参与者(40.85%)三解释隐喻概念,在结构之间的通讯,目标域来源。此外,20个参与者解释(28.17%)至少一个的隐喻,元素应用不,来源域的一部分。Theresultsoftheexperimentrevealed thatlearnerswith "整体的" cognitivestylesweremorelikelytoblendtheirconceptionofthetarget domainwiththesourcedomainincomparisontoparticipantswith "分析的" styles;also， "意象者" weremorelikelythan "语言者" torefertostereotypicalimagestoexplainthemetaphors。关键词分析，认知风格，概念隐喻，整体，意象，语言表达
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
Iranian EFL Learners' Cognitive Styles and Their Explanations of Conceptual Metaphors
ThecurrentstudyaimstoinvestigateIranianEFLlearners’cognitivestylesandtheirexplanationsof conceptualmetaphors,offeringapossiblerangeofindividualdifferencesinmetaphorprocessing.71 participantswereaskedtoexplainsomeestablishedconceptualmetaphorsthatarecommonlyused inEnglish.Then,theircognitivestyleswereclassifiedinto“analytic”or“holistic”and“imager”or “verbalizer”bymeansofcognitivestylestest.Dataanalysisrevealedthat29participants(40.85%) explained the threeconceptualmetaphorsbymaking structural correspondencesbetweensource andtargetdomain.Moreover,20participants(28.17%)explainedatleastoneofthemetaphorsby applyingelementswhichwerenotpartofthesourcedomain.Theresultsoftheexperimentrevealed thatlearnerswith“holistic”cognitivestylesweremorelikelytoblendtheirconceptionofthetarget domainwiththesourcedomainincomparisontoparticipantswith“analytic”styles;also,“imagers” weremorelikelythan“verbalizers”torefertostereotypicalimagestoexplainthemetaphors. KEywoRdS Analytic, Cognitive Style, Conceptual Metaphor, Holistic, Imager, Verbalizer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments
International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信