医师在全民医疗保健系统中扮演双重代理人:来自台湾仿制药采用的证据

M. Tang
{"title":"医师在全民医疗保健系统中扮演双重代理人:来自台湾仿制药采用的证据","authors":"M. Tang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2736754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physicians’ generic pharmaceutical adoption involves not only patients’ and insurance payers’ cost, but also their own interests. This study examines this double agency problem for physicians by using Taiwanese data because two of its institutional features: First, patients and physicians in a universal health care system did not self-select their insurance plans. Second, physicians in Taiwan respond to strong financial incentives because they are allowed to both prescribe and dispense drugs. The empirical results show that a larger price difference between brand-name and generic drugs increases physicians’ likelihood for prescribing generic prescriptions. However, this effect decreases as the payer’s cost share percentage increases. These results indicate that physicians’ prescriptions decision internalize patients’ cost but not the payer’s ones. This study also demonstrates that physicians who are more responsive to profits prescribed more generic drugs, including owners of hospitals and clinics, and physicians in clinics and private institutions. However, this effect decreases as the number of competitors in the drug market increases.","PeriodicalId":11036,"journal":{"name":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicians as Double Agents in a Universal Health Care System: Evidence from Generic Pharmaceutical Adoption in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"M. Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2736754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physicians’ generic pharmaceutical adoption involves not only patients’ and insurance payers’ cost, but also their own interests. This study examines this double agency problem for physicians by using Taiwanese data because two of its institutional features: First, patients and physicians in a universal health care system did not self-select their insurance plans. Second, physicians in Taiwan respond to strong financial incentives because they are allowed to both prescribe and dispense drugs. The empirical results show that a larger price difference between brand-name and generic drugs increases physicians’ likelihood for prescribing generic prescriptions. However, this effect decreases as the payer’s cost share percentage increases. These results indicate that physicians’ prescriptions decision internalize patients’ cost but not the payer’s ones. This study also demonstrates that physicians who are more responsive to profits prescribed more generic drugs, including owners of hospitals and clinics, and physicians in clinics and private institutions. However, this effect decreases as the number of competitors in the drug market increases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2736754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demand & Supply in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2736754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生采用仿制药不仅涉及患者和保险支付者的成本,也涉及医生自身的利益。本研究使用台湾的资料来检视医师的双重代理问题,因为它有两个制度特征:第一,在全民医疗保健系统中,患者和医师都没有自我选择他们的保险计划。其次,台湾的医生会对强大的经济激励做出反应,因为他们既可以开处方,也可以配药。实证结果表明,品牌药与仿制药之间的价格差异越大,医生开仿制药的可能性越大。然而,这种影响随着付款人的成本份额百分比的增加而减少。这些结果表明,医生的处方决策内化了患者的成本,而不是付款人的成本。这项研究还表明,对利润更敏感的医生,包括医院和诊所的老板,以及诊所和私人机构的医生,会开出更多的仿制药。然而,随着药品市场竞争对手数量的增加,这种效应会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicians as Double Agents in a Universal Health Care System: Evidence from Generic Pharmaceutical Adoption in Taiwan
Physicians’ generic pharmaceutical adoption involves not only patients’ and insurance payers’ cost, but also their own interests. This study examines this double agency problem for physicians by using Taiwanese data because two of its institutional features: First, patients and physicians in a universal health care system did not self-select their insurance plans. Second, physicians in Taiwan respond to strong financial incentives because they are allowed to both prescribe and dispense drugs. The empirical results show that a larger price difference between brand-name and generic drugs increases physicians’ likelihood for prescribing generic prescriptions. However, this effect decreases as the payer’s cost share percentage increases. These results indicate that physicians’ prescriptions decision internalize patients’ cost but not the payer’s ones. This study also demonstrates that physicians who are more responsive to profits prescribed more generic drugs, including owners of hospitals and clinics, and physicians in clinics and private institutions. However, this effect decreases as the number of competitors in the drug market increases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信