俄语图书出版标准:应用与实施的特点

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
O. Klimova, I. Plotnikova
{"title":"俄语图书出版标准:应用与实施的特点","authors":"O. Klimova, I. Plotnikova","doi":"10.17223/23062061/30/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines modern publishing standards in force on the territory of the Russian Federation, provides the list of the most important GOST standards for employees of the publishing sector, names the causes of non-compliance by Russian publishers with the standards in the preparation of book products, and shows ways to resolve the current situation. The conditions for the putting of GOST standards into effect, the complexity of their application, and the contradictions between them are analyzed. The article raises the problem of searching for updated GOST standards and/or those put into effect instead of outdated ones, and the question about the recommendatory nature of the standards, which allows unscrupulous publishers to violate GOST standards with impunit. The authors believe that, in order to speak about the high culture of editions and publications in Russia, it is necessary to regard the SIBID standards as mandatory requirements. On the basis of the undertaken analysis of the practice of applying the standards in the Russian book publishing, the expediency of applying the existing standards, adapting them to the modern publishing environment, etc., options for interaction between GOST developers and practical publishers, ways to consolidate the professional publishing community on the basis of the RBC platform in order to discuss topical issues of book publishing, testing new and updated GOST standards, refining of the existing standards by practical publishers are proposed. The authors of the article believe that the possibility of such a dialogue will improve the situation with Russian book publishing and will quickly remove contradictions in the GOSTs because only the compliance with publishing standards will allow publishers to maintain a high publication culture and book quality, and therefore will contribute to the creation of the professional image in the publishing industry and the publishing house reputation as a whole. The authors are convinced that it is necessary to have an open access to information about the introduced GOST standards at the stage of their development/implementation/testing, to indicate the developers of the standards, and to give an opportunity of giving a feedback to them (which means the creation of a centralized system of interaction within the professional community (e.g., on the RBC website)); that the changes in the standards should become predictable, expected and systematic, allowing to gradually introduce new standards and promptly make corrections to GOST before it is put into effect. All the theoretical provisions of the article are supported by the real examples from publishing practice. Also, as a part of the undertaken research, a survey was conducted among the students of the Ural Federal University (Yekaterinburg) related by the nature of their future activities to the SIBID standards. The survey has shown that there is currently an urgent need to involve practitioners in the development of new GOST standards. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":40676,"journal":{"name":"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards in Russian book publishing: Features of application and implementation\",\"authors\":\"O. Klimova, I. Plotnikova\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/23062061/30/9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines modern publishing standards in force on the territory of the Russian Federation, provides the list of the most important GOST standards for employees of the publishing sector, names the causes of non-compliance by Russian publishers with the standards in the preparation of book products, and shows ways to resolve the current situation. The conditions for the putting of GOST standards into effect, the complexity of their application, and the contradictions between them are analyzed. The article raises the problem of searching for updated GOST standards and/or those put into effect instead of outdated ones, and the question about the recommendatory nature of the standards, which allows unscrupulous publishers to violate GOST standards with impunit. The authors believe that, in order to speak about the high culture of editions and publications in Russia, it is necessary to regard the SIBID standards as mandatory requirements. On the basis of the undertaken analysis of the practice of applying the standards in the Russian book publishing, the expediency of applying the existing standards, adapting them to the modern publishing environment, etc., options for interaction between GOST developers and practical publishers, ways to consolidate the professional publishing community on the basis of the RBC platform in order to discuss topical issues of book publishing, testing new and updated GOST standards, refining of the existing standards by practical publishers are proposed. The authors of the article believe that the possibility of such a dialogue will improve the situation with Russian book publishing and will quickly remove contradictions in the GOSTs because only the compliance with publishing standards will allow publishers to maintain a high publication culture and book quality, and therefore will contribute to the creation of the professional image in the publishing industry and the publishing house reputation as a whole. The authors are convinced that it is necessary to have an open access to information about the introduced GOST standards at the stage of their development/implementation/testing, to indicate the developers of the standards, and to give an opportunity of giving a feedback to them (which means the creation of a centralized system of interaction within the professional community (e.g., on the RBC website)); that the changes in the standards should become predictable, expected and systematic, allowing to gradually introduce new standards and promptly make corrections to GOST before it is put into effect. All the theoretical provisions of the article are supported by the real examples from publishing practice. Also, as a part of the undertaken research, a survey was conducted among the students of the Ural Federal University (Yekaterinburg) related by the nature of their future activities to the SIBID standards. The survey has shown that there is currently an urgent need to involve practitioners in the development of new GOST standards. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/23062061/30/9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/23062061/30/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文审查了俄罗斯联邦境内现行的现代出版标准,为出版部门的雇员提供了最重要的GOST标准清单,列出了俄罗斯出版商在编写图书产品时不遵守标准的原因,并指出了解决目前情况的方法。分析了GOST标准实施的条件、应用的复杂性以及两者之间的矛盾。本文提出了搜索更新的GOST标准和(或)已生效的GOST标准而不是过时的标准的问题,以及标准的推荐性问题,这使得不道德的出版商违反GOST标准而不受惩罚。作者认为,为了谈论俄罗斯的高级版本和出版物文化,有必要将SIBID标准视为强制性要求。在对俄罗斯图书出版应用标准的实践、应用现有标准的便捷性、使其适应现代出版环境等进行分析的基础上,对GOST开发者和实际出版商之间的互动选择、在RBC平台上巩固专业出版社区以讨论图书出版的热点问题、测试新的和更新的GOST标准的方法进行了分析。建议由实际出版商对现有标准进行完善。本文的作者认为,这种对话的可能性将改善与俄罗斯图书出版的状况,并将迅速消除gost中的矛盾,因为只有遵守出版标准,才能使出版商保持较高的出版文化和图书质量,从而有助于出版业专业形象的塑造和出版社整体声誉的提高。作者确信,有必要在其开发/实施/测试阶段开放获取有关引入的GOST标准的信息,指出标准的开发人员,并提供给他们反馈的机会(这意味着在专业社区内创建一个集中的互动系统(例如,在RBC网站上));标准的修订应具有可预测性、可预期性和系统性,以便逐步引入新标准,并在GOST生效前及时对其进行修正。文章的所有理论规定都有出版实践的实例支持。此外,作为所进行研究的一部分,在乌拉尔联邦大学(叶卡捷琳堡)的学生中进行了一项调查,根据他们未来活动的性质与SIBID标准有关。调查显示,目前迫切需要让从业人员参与制定新的GOST标准。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standards in Russian book publishing: Features of application and implementation
The article examines modern publishing standards in force on the territory of the Russian Federation, provides the list of the most important GOST standards for employees of the publishing sector, names the causes of non-compliance by Russian publishers with the standards in the preparation of book products, and shows ways to resolve the current situation. The conditions for the putting of GOST standards into effect, the complexity of their application, and the contradictions between them are analyzed. The article raises the problem of searching for updated GOST standards and/or those put into effect instead of outdated ones, and the question about the recommendatory nature of the standards, which allows unscrupulous publishers to violate GOST standards with impunit. The authors believe that, in order to speak about the high culture of editions and publications in Russia, it is necessary to regard the SIBID standards as mandatory requirements. On the basis of the undertaken analysis of the practice of applying the standards in the Russian book publishing, the expediency of applying the existing standards, adapting them to the modern publishing environment, etc., options for interaction between GOST developers and practical publishers, ways to consolidate the professional publishing community on the basis of the RBC platform in order to discuss topical issues of book publishing, testing new and updated GOST standards, refining of the existing standards by practical publishers are proposed. The authors of the article believe that the possibility of such a dialogue will improve the situation with Russian book publishing and will quickly remove contradictions in the GOSTs because only the compliance with publishing standards will allow publishers to maintain a high publication culture and book quality, and therefore will contribute to the creation of the professional image in the publishing industry and the publishing house reputation as a whole. The authors are convinced that it is necessary to have an open access to information about the introduced GOST standards at the stage of their development/implementation/testing, to indicate the developers of the standards, and to give an opportunity of giving a feedback to them (which means the creation of a centralized system of interaction within the professional community (e.g., on the RBC website)); that the changes in the standards should become predictable, expected and systematic, allowing to gradually introduce new standards and promptly make corrections to GOST before it is put into effect. All the theoretical provisions of the article are supported by the real examples from publishing practice. Also, as a part of the undertaken research, a survey was conducted among the students of the Ural Federal University (Yekaterinburg) related by the nature of their future activities to the SIBID standards. The survey has shown that there is currently an urgent need to involve practitioners in the development of new GOST standards. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing
Tekst Kniga Knigoizdanie-Text Book Publishing HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信