德国卫生保健系统的价值和结构。

D. Light
{"title":"德国卫生保健系统的价值和结构。","authors":"D. Light","doi":"10.2307/3349852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"values and health care, no work addresses the divided Germany that was forced into existence following the conclusion of World War II. The omission is surprising since the resultant individualistic West and the Communist East provide the researcher with a \"natural experiment\" in history, one in which a third of the world's oldest and perhaps most sophisticated health care system itself became an experiment in the application of Marxist/socialist ideology. Examining this experiment has distinct advantages over other comparisons of health care under Communist versus non-Communist governments. If one compares health care services .before and after a Communist takeover, one is unable to examine how the former society and its health care system would have evolved over time had a political upheaval not taken place. Alternately, if one compares a Communist and a non-Communist system in two countries during the same period, the problem of periodicity is solved but the problem of comparability is increased. Inevitably, there are differences of language, culture, history, medical institutions, forms of insurance, and other relevant variables. Happily, the German experience comes as close as is humanly possible to what Campbell (1969) calls a quasi experiment, in which","PeriodicalId":76697,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","volume":"42 1","pages":"615-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Values and structure in the German health care systems.\",\"authors\":\"D. Light\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3349852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"values and health care, no work addresses the divided Germany that was forced into existence following the conclusion of World War II. The omission is surprising since the resultant individualistic West and the Communist East provide the researcher with a \\\"natural experiment\\\" in history, one in which a third of the world's oldest and perhaps most sophisticated health care system itself became an experiment in the application of Marxist/socialist ideology. Examining this experiment has distinct advantages over other comparisons of health care under Communist versus non-Communist governments. If one compares health care services .before and after a Communist takeover, one is unable to examine how the former society and its health care system would have evolved over time had a political upheaval not taken place. Alternately, if one compares a Communist and a non-Communist system in two countries during the same period, the problem of periodicity is solved but the problem of comparability is increased. Inevitably, there are differences of language, culture, history, medical institutions, forms of insurance, and other relevant variables. Happily, the German experience comes as close as is humanly possible to what Campbell (1969) calls a quasi experiment, in which\",\"PeriodicalId\":76697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"615-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在价值观和医疗保健方面,没有一部作品涉及二战结束后被迫存在的分裂的德国。遗漏是令人惊讶的,因为由此产生的个人主义的西方和共产主义的东方为研究者提供了一个历史上的“自然实验”,在这个实验中,世界上最古老、也许是最复杂的医疗保健系统本身成为了马克思主义/社会主义意识形态应用的实验。与其他比较共产主义和非共产主义政府下的医疗保健相比,检验这一实验具有明显的优势。如果比较共产党掌权前后的卫生保健服务,就无法考察如果没有发生政治动荡,前社会及其卫生保健系统将如何随着时间的推移而演变。另外,如果比较同一时期两个国家的共产主义制度和非共产主义制度,周期性问题解决了,但可比性问题增加了。不可避免地,语言、文化、历史、医疗机构、保险形式和其他相关变量存在差异。令人高兴的是,德国的经验尽可能接近坎贝尔(Campbell, 1969)所称的准实验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Values and structure in the German health care systems.
values and health care, no work addresses the divided Germany that was forced into existence following the conclusion of World War II. The omission is surprising since the resultant individualistic West and the Communist East provide the researcher with a "natural experiment" in history, one in which a third of the world's oldest and perhaps most sophisticated health care system itself became an experiment in the application of Marxist/socialist ideology. Examining this experiment has distinct advantages over other comparisons of health care under Communist versus non-Communist governments. If one compares health care services .before and after a Communist takeover, one is unable to examine how the former society and its health care system would have evolved over time had a political upheaval not taken place. Alternately, if one compares a Communist and a non-Communist system in two countries during the same period, the problem of periodicity is solved but the problem of comparability is increased. Inevitably, there are differences of language, culture, history, medical institutions, forms of insurance, and other relevant variables. Happily, the German experience comes as close as is humanly possible to what Campbell (1969) calls a quasi experiment, in which
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信