利用员工持股计划实现劳动力平台的民主化

T. Gonza, D. Ellerman
{"title":"利用员工持股计划实现劳动力平台的民主化","authors":"T. Gonza, D. Ellerman","doi":"10.1080/05775132.2022.2038887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores a new strategy to address the problem of “gig-workers” in labor-based platform companies. The two current strategies are (1) regulations (e.g., requiring platforms to recognized workers as employees) or (2) creating new platform cooperatives to compete with the established platforms. The authors propose a third complementary approach, which is democratizing and adapting the Employee Stock Ownership Plan to gain co-ownership in the local subsidiaries of the labor-based platforms (LBP). This option puts a new tool in the hands of the municipal and national regulatory authorities.","PeriodicalId":88850,"journal":{"name":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","volume":"19 1","pages":"34 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using ESOPs to Democratize Labor-Based Platforms\",\"authors\":\"T. Gonza, D. Ellerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/05775132.2022.2038887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores a new strategy to address the problem of “gig-workers” in labor-based platform companies. The two current strategies are (1) regulations (e.g., requiring platforms to recognized workers as employees) or (2) creating new platform cooperatives to compete with the established platforms. The authors propose a third complementary approach, which is democratizing and adapting the Employee Stock Ownership Plan to gain co-ownership in the local subsidiaries of the labor-based platforms (LBP). This option puts a new tool in the hands of the municipal and national regulatory authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2022.2038887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2022.2038887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文探讨了解决劳务平台公司“零工”问题的新策略。目前的两个策略是(1)法规(例如,要求平台承认工人为雇员)或(2)创建新的平台合作社与现有平台竞争。作者提出了第三种补充方法,即民主化和调整员工持股计划,以获得基于劳动力的平台(LBP)的当地子公司的共同所有权。这一选择为市政和国家监管机构提供了一种新工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using ESOPs to Democratize Labor-Based Platforms
Abstract This paper explores a new strategy to address the problem of “gig-workers” in labor-based platform companies. The two current strategies are (1) regulations (e.g., requiring platforms to recognized workers as employees) or (2) creating new platform cooperatives to compete with the established platforms. The authors propose a third complementary approach, which is democratizing and adapting the Employee Stock Ownership Plan to gain co-ownership in the local subsidiaries of the labor-based platforms (LBP). This option puts a new tool in the hands of the municipal and national regulatory authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信