层次分析法在建筑工程投标中的应用

MSIE 2011 Pub Date : 2011-02-04 DOI:10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707715

Hongliang Cao

{"title":"层次分析法在建筑工程投标中的应用","authors":"Hongliang Cao","doi":"10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper stated the impact of the application of the analytic hierarchy process (referred to as the AHP) factors on construction project bidding. In order to eliminate subjective factors on the results of the tender, indicators (program) is obtained by pairwise comparing the importance of the weight of each index, and determine the pros and cons of each program sort. Finally the evaluation and determination of the fair and scientific method determine the successful tender.","PeriodicalId":18774,"journal":{"name":"MSIE 2011","volume":"13 1","pages":"274-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic hierarchy process applications in the construction of the project tender\",\"authors\":\"Hongliang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper stated the impact of the application of the analytic hierarchy process (referred to as the AHP) factors on construction project bidding. In order to eliminate subjective factors on the results of the tender, indicators (program) is obtained by pairwise comparing the importance of the weight of each index, and determine the pros and cons of each program sort. Finally the evaluation and determination of the fair and scientific method determine the successful tender.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MSIE 2011\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"274-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MSIE 2011\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSIE 2011","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSIE.2011.5707715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文阐述了层次分析法(AHP)应用对建筑工程招投标的影响因素。为了消除主观因素对投标结果的影响，通过两两比较各指标的重要性权重得到指标(方案)，并确定各方案排序的优劣。最后以公正、科学的评标方法确定中标。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Analytic hierarchy process applications in the construction of the project tender

This paper stated the impact of the application of the analytic hierarchy process (referred to as the AHP) factors on construction project bidding. In order to eliminate subjective factors on the results of the tender, indicators (program) is obtained by pairwise comparing the importance of the weight of each index, and determine the pros and cons of each program sort. Finally the evaluation and determination of the fair and scientific method determine the successful tender.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

MSIE 2011

自引率

0.00%

发文量