运用基于agent的建模方法探讨包容性交通建筑设计的实践

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
John Harding
{"title":"运用基于agent的建模方法探讨包容性交通建筑设计的实践","authors":"John Harding","doi":"10.1680/JURDP.18.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subtle differences between universal design (UD) and inclusive design (ID) discourses impact inclusivity in practice. The level of service (LOS) is used as a proxy to evaluate inclusivity and agent...","PeriodicalId":44716,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using agent-based modelling to probe inclusive transport building design in practice\",\"authors\":\"John Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/JURDP.18.00028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subtle differences between universal design (UD) and inclusive design (ID) discourses impact inclusivity in practice. The level of service (LOS) is used as a proxy to evaluate inclusivity and agent...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/JURDP.18.00028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/JURDP.18.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通用设计(UD)和包容性设计(ID)话语之间的微妙差异影响了实践中的包容性。使用服务水平(LOS)作为评估包容性和代理性的代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using agent-based modelling to probe inclusive transport building design in practice
Subtle differences between universal design (UD) and inclusive design (ID) discourses impact inclusivity in practice. The level of service (LOS) is used as a proxy to evaluate inclusivity and agent...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信