{"title":"玻璃纤维针安装前消毒方案中使用酒精与氯己定对粘连性增加的影响:系统文献综述","authors":"Anna Luísa de Castro Mafra Rodrigues, D. Paiva","doi":"10.1590/1981-863720220005520210104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Many clinical failures involving the fiberglass post result from the detachment between the retainer, the root canal and the cement. Thus, the connections that cause a probability of these failures are essential for dentistry. Objective: To compare the efficiency of intracanal disinfection between alcohol and chlorhexidine in the context of minimizing fractures. Methods: The present systematic review registered in PROSPERO under the protocol CRD42021233516 based on a Medical Subject Headings strategy: “((Endodontics OR Root Canal Filling Materials OR Dental Materials) AND Chlorhexidine AND Ethanol AND Dental Bonding)” in the search engines PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Lilacs. Studies in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included, without restrictions regarding their methodology and year of publication. Articles that did not report an intracanal hygiene protocol before the procedure, without full publication and orthodontic research were excluded. Results: Six studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all, chlorhexidine was used for intracanal cleaning, comparing it with the other groups, and in 4 it was compared with alcohol and other groups. Discussion: The articles used different media and storage times and most used bovine teeth. There was no significant difference between any other characteristics regarding the increase in adhesiveness of the set. Conclusion: There is no difference between the use of alcohol or chlorhexidine as a disinfection method. However, a previous protocol must be established for longer treatment longevity.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the use of alcohol and chlorhexidine in the intracanal disinfection protocol before the installation of fiberglass pin related to the increase in adhesiveness: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Anna Luísa de Castro Mafra Rodrigues, D. Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-863720220005520210104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction: Many clinical failures involving the fiberglass post result from the detachment between the retainer, the root canal and the cement. Thus, the connections that cause a probability of these failures are essential for dentistry. Objective: To compare the efficiency of intracanal disinfection between alcohol and chlorhexidine in the context of minimizing fractures. Methods: The present systematic review registered in PROSPERO under the protocol CRD42021233516 based on a Medical Subject Headings strategy: “((Endodontics OR Root Canal Filling Materials OR Dental Materials) AND Chlorhexidine AND Ethanol AND Dental Bonding)” in the search engines PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Lilacs. Studies in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included, without restrictions regarding their methodology and year of publication. Articles that did not report an intracanal hygiene protocol before the procedure, without full publication and orthodontic research were excluded. Results: Six studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all, chlorhexidine was used for intracanal cleaning, comparing it with the other groups, and in 4 it was compared with alcohol and other groups. Discussion: The articles used different media and storage times and most used bovine teeth. There was no significant difference between any other characteristics regarding the increase in adhesiveness of the set. Conclusion: There is no difference between the use of alcohol or chlorhexidine as a disinfection method. However, a previous protocol must be established for longer treatment longevity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720220005520210104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720220005520210104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要简介:许多涉及玻璃纤维桩的临床失败是由于固位器、根管和骨水泥之间的脱离。因此,导致这些故障的连接对牙科至关重要。目的:比较酒精和氯己定在减少骨折情况下的消毒效果。方法:本系统综述在PROSPERO上注册,编号为CRD42021233516,基于医学主题标题策略:“((牙髓学或根管填充材料或牙科材料)和氯己定、乙醇和牙科结合)”,检索引擎为PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase和Lilacs。包括葡萄牙语、英语或西班牙语的研究,不受其方法和出版年份的限制。未报道手术前管内卫生方案的文章,没有完整的出版物和正畸研究被排除在外。结果:根据纳入和排除标准共选择6项研究。其中,氯己定用于肛管内清洗,与其他组进行比较,4例与酒精和其他组进行比较。讨论:文章使用不同的介质和储存时间,大多数使用牛牙。在粘连性的增加方面,任何其他特征之间没有显著差异。结论:酒精消毒与氯己定消毒无明显差异。然而,为了延长治疗寿命,必须建立先前的方案。
Comparison between the use of alcohol and chlorhexidine in the intracanal disinfection protocol before the installation of fiberglass pin related to the increase in adhesiveness: a systematic literature review
ABSTRACT Introduction: Many clinical failures involving the fiberglass post result from the detachment between the retainer, the root canal and the cement. Thus, the connections that cause a probability of these failures are essential for dentistry. Objective: To compare the efficiency of intracanal disinfection between alcohol and chlorhexidine in the context of minimizing fractures. Methods: The present systematic review registered in PROSPERO under the protocol CRD42021233516 based on a Medical Subject Headings strategy: “((Endodontics OR Root Canal Filling Materials OR Dental Materials) AND Chlorhexidine AND Ethanol AND Dental Bonding)” in the search engines PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Lilacs. Studies in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included, without restrictions regarding their methodology and year of publication. Articles that did not report an intracanal hygiene protocol before the procedure, without full publication and orthodontic research were excluded. Results: Six studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all, chlorhexidine was used for intracanal cleaning, comparing it with the other groups, and in 4 it was compared with alcohol and other groups. Discussion: The articles used different media and storage times and most used bovine teeth. There was no significant difference between any other characteristics regarding the increase in adhesiveness of the set. Conclusion: There is no difference between the use of alcohol or chlorhexidine as a disinfection method. However, a previous protocol must be established for longer treatment longevity.