场、习惯和幻觉——皮埃尔·布迪厄在调查巴西体育教育学术子领域(媒体和技术)构成的过程中提出的概念三合一

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cristiano Mezzaroba, Jaison José Bassani
{"title":"场、习惯和幻觉——皮埃尔·布迪厄在调查巴西体育教育学术子领域(媒体和技术)构成的过程中提出的概念三合一","authors":"Cristiano Mezzaroba, Jaison José Bassani","doi":"10.1590/1984-0411.85962-t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents a research characterized as a historical sociology of the subfield of media and technologies (M&T) within the field of Brazilian Physical Education (PE), with the Bourdieusian concepts of field,habitusandillusio, seeking to inventory and analyze the constitution and consolidation of this movement in PE. Methodologically, it was configured as a qualitative research, of the case study type, seeking to understand this field and its conditions of possibilities. We presented and analyzed the interviews with nine agents of the aforementioned social space, who occupied/occupy structures of power within the subfield, coordinating the Communication and Media Thematic Working Group of the Brazilian School of Sport Sciences. It was possible to organize five interpretative axes, strongly related to the three concepts that epistemologically supported the research: (1) The subfield of M&T in the field of Brazilian PE: origin, conflicts, contemporaneity; (2) The social and academic legitimacy of PE; (3) Cultural formation and interdisciplinary aspects: thehabitusand the implications in the university and in school; (4) Cultural sociodynamics and implications in the university and school; (5) Affect as a disinterested interest: decodingillusio’s mechanisms. We conclude that every effort to capitalize on this “scientific game” carried out by the agents (as a network of sociability) is giving prominence to the subfield, as a strategy and collective effort to intensely pursue the objective of increasing the academic, scientific and social legitimacy of Brazilian PE, now with contributions from the social sciences and humanities.","PeriodicalId":45723,"journal":{"name":"Educar em Revista","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field, habitus and illusio - Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual triad in the exercise of investigating the constitution of an academic subfield (media and technologies) in brazilian Physical Education\",\"authors\":\"Cristiano Mezzaroba, Jaison José Bassani\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1984-0411.85962-t\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article presents a research characterized as a historical sociology of the subfield of media and technologies (M&T) within the field of Brazilian Physical Education (PE), with the Bourdieusian concepts of field,habitusandillusio, seeking to inventory and analyze the constitution and consolidation of this movement in PE. Methodologically, it was configured as a qualitative research, of the case study type, seeking to understand this field and its conditions of possibilities. We presented and analyzed the interviews with nine agents of the aforementioned social space, who occupied/occupy structures of power within the subfield, coordinating the Communication and Media Thematic Working Group of the Brazilian School of Sport Sciences. It was possible to organize five interpretative axes, strongly related to the three concepts that epistemologically supported the research: (1) The subfield of M&T in the field of Brazilian PE: origin, conflicts, contemporaneity; (2) The social and academic legitimacy of PE; (3) Cultural formation and interdisciplinary aspects: thehabitusand the implications in the university and in school; (4) Cultural sociodynamics and implications in the university and school; (5) Affect as a disinterested interest: decodingillusio’s mechanisms. We conclude that every effort to capitalize on this “scientific game” carried out by the agents (as a network of sociability) is giving prominence to the subfield, as a strategy and collective effort to intensely pursue the objective of increasing the academic, scientific and social legitimacy of Brazilian PE, now with contributions from the social sciences and humanities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educar em Revista\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educar em Revista\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.85962-t\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educar em Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.85962-t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一项以巴西体育(PE)领域中媒体和技术(M&T)子领域的历史社会学为特征的研究,采用布尔迪乌的场、习惯和幻觉概念,试图盘点和分析体育中这一运动的构成和巩固。在方法上,它被配置为案例研究类型的定性研究,试图了解这个领域及其可能性的条件。我们提出并分析了上述社会空间的九名代理人的访谈,他们在子领域内占据/占据权力结构,协调巴西体育科学学院的传播和媒体主题工作组。可以组织五个解释轴,它们与认识论上支持研究的三个概念密切相关:(1)巴西体育领域中的M&T子领域:起源、冲突、当代性;(2)体育的社会和学术合法性;(3)文化形成和跨学科方面:大学和学校的习惯和影响;(4)大学和学校的文化社会动态及其影响;(5)情感作为一种非感兴趣的兴趣:解读幻觉的机制。我们的结论是,利用代理人(作为社交网络)进行的这种“科学游戏”的每一项努力都突出了子领域,作为一种战略和集体努力,强烈追求提高巴西体育的学术、科学和社会合法性的目标,现在有社会科学和人文科学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field, habitus and illusio - Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual triad in the exercise of investigating the constitution of an academic subfield (media and technologies) in brazilian Physical Education
ABSTRACT This article presents a research characterized as a historical sociology of the subfield of media and technologies (M&T) within the field of Brazilian Physical Education (PE), with the Bourdieusian concepts of field,habitusandillusio, seeking to inventory and analyze the constitution and consolidation of this movement in PE. Methodologically, it was configured as a qualitative research, of the case study type, seeking to understand this field and its conditions of possibilities. We presented and analyzed the interviews with nine agents of the aforementioned social space, who occupied/occupy structures of power within the subfield, coordinating the Communication and Media Thematic Working Group of the Brazilian School of Sport Sciences. It was possible to organize five interpretative axes, strongly related to the three concepts that epistemologically supported the research: (1) The subfield of M&T in the field of Brazilian PE: origin, conflicts, contemporaneity; (2) The social and academic legitimacy of PE; (3) Cultural formation and interdisciplinary aspects: thehabitusand the implications in the university and in school; (4) Cultural sociodynamics and implications in the university and school; (5) Affect as a disinterested interest: decodingillusio’s mechanisms. We conclude that every effort to capitalize on this “scientific game” carried out by the agents (as a network of sociability) is giving prominence to the subfield, as a strategy and collective effort to intensely pursue the objective of increasing the academic, scientific and social legitimacy of Brazilian PE, now with contributions from the social sciences and humanities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educar em Revista
Educar em Revista EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信