临时禁令和专利的运作:来自印度的简短说明

Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector Pub Date : 2020-02-25 DOI:10.1177/1741134320905341

Sandeep K Rathod

{"title":"临时禁令和专利的运作:来自印度的简短说明","authors":"Sandeep K Rathod","doi":"10.1177/1741134320905341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article looks at how jurisprudence has evolved in Indian courts on granting or refusing injunctions to patentees, especially when such patentees are not working/commercially using their patented product in India. The author also presents his views on the recent Eisai v. Dr Reddys case.","PeriodicalId":15914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","volume":"2010 1","pages":"72 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interim injunctions and working of patents: A short note from India\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep K Rathod\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1741134320905341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article looks at how jurisprudence has evolved in Indian courts on granting or refusing injunctions to patentees, especially when such patentees are not working/commercially using their patented product in India. The author also presents his views on the recent Eisai v. Dr Reddys case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector\",\"volume\":\"2010 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741134320905341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741134320905341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着眼于印度法院在授予或拒绝专利权人禁令方面的法理学演变，特别是当这些专利权人不在印度工作/商业上使用其专利产品时。作者还提出了他对最近卫材诉redys博士案的看法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Interim injunctions and working of patents: A short note from India

The article looks at how jurisprudence has evolved in Indian courts on granting or refusing injunctions to patentees, especially when such patentees are not working/commercially using their patented product in India. The author also presents his views on the recent Eisai v. Dr Reddys case.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector

自引率

0.00%

发文量